21107 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
imo random pairings are a bad idea. Using ratings for pairing makes it more likely that the strongest player will win which is what tournaments should be about. Random pairings only make it more likely that a weak player will score highly or a strong player badly, and intoduces an element of luck. This is bad imo.
@the anti-chess.com rant
imo chess.com is more appealing to the lower-rated players because- the training software is geared at weaker players, also at higher levels there are more cheaters due to the lack of an option to make a computer account.
also i think premoves should not be stackable but i dont care much either way
I think that rating should definitely be a factor in first round and every other round pairings. The #1 player should get paired with the guy in the middle the #2 player should gets paired with the (middle - 1) a.s.o. Here the lowest rated player is expected to loose and get an easier game and the highest rated player to win and get a harder game. The only time you get a harder game is if you win. With this systems if you keep winning the games it should get harder and harder as the games progress. If you think that those with a higher rating get an easier games well this is a misconception. For instance if your in the top half of the draw you should theoretically get an easier game in the first round than the top board. In-fact if the games go 'to form' the highest rated player should get the hardest game in every round (except those in the lower half of the draw in round one, the ones in the bottom half of the top half of the draw in round 2 [anyways you'll only get one game harder than the top board]). The only time you play harder opposition than the top board is when you keep winning when you are expected to loose. So you should only get harder games than the top board when you're improving. If you are improving you'll have a higher rating in the next draw, with all the perceived benefits this brings.
In TaMilNadU%%09829791419";[LoVE$%VasHikAraN@#Specialist In HyDerAbAd
by SilentKnighte5 a few minutes ago
by ThrillerFan 3 minutes ago
Report SPAM here (Not cheating, Not abuse, ONLY spam)
by wanmokewan 4 minutes ago
Why do people get chess.com to socialize?
by 1hey 5 minutes ago
Tactical issues- how can I fix this? Please help!
by izzijaaz666 5 minutes ago
10/24/2016 - Bishop Be Gone
by Vini_itj 7 minutes ago
World Championship 2016: Predict and win 100 TROPHIES!
by izzijaaz666 9 minutes ago
Which book helped you the most in your chess improvement?
by ThrillerFan 10 minutes ago
Moves understandable only by gods?
by 0110001101101000 11 minutes ago
if Fischer played in 75, could Kasparov have defeated him in 1984?
by izzijaaz666 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!