19914 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The designations "Online Chess" and "Turn-Based Chess" confused me for a while when I first discovered this great website. Of course I get it now, but I'm curious as to how these terms came to be selected.
"Live Chess" is pretty obvious and not confusing--it's OTB Chess as it's played online. But there's that word . . . "online."
"Online Chess" means CC Chess as it's played online. But "Live Chess" is played online, too, so . . . why was "Online Chess" selected for CC only? (I suppose it also could be pointed out that "Online Chess" is played live, too, but . . . that doesn't seem so confusing.)
And "Turn-Based Chess" means "Online Chess," but not "Live Chess," even though all chess is based on players alternating turns. I don't encounter the phrase "Turn-Based Chess" anywhere except here at Chess.com, so how did that alternative name for "Online Chess" originate?
"Okay, so what's better, Jack?" I dunno . . . maybe just recognizing that here at Chess.com we play modern, online versions of both OTB and CC? So, maybe they could be called "Online OTB" and "Online CC" . . . or "OTB Online" and "CC Online." (Perhaps with Over The Board Chess and Correspondence Chess written out in the introductory website pages for newbies.) I dunno if that's really better in any significant sense. But maybe it would be less confusing for newcomers.
Those who stick around don't seem to have any problem adjusting to the current terminology. But, of course, we never know about people who come and leave before they figure it out, so we can't say how confusing it is for how many folk for how long. I dunno, the phrases Online Chess and Turn-Based Chess just strike me as curious. Not a big deal though.
I know the name for online (turn-based) chess was brought in a survey a while back. It can be found at http://www.chess.com/survey/right-now-we-call-it-email-chess-but-what-do-you-think-we-should-call-this-kind-of-non-live-asyn2. Sorry for the long url
this was a long and crazy debate. we actually called it email chess at the beginning (which is why the URLs are called "echess"). but that was confusing because it has nothing to do with email. correspondence chess - what are you corresponding with and who under the age of 30 even knows what the word correspondence means? :) plus, it's not a term that new (non-tournament) players understand. then we considered turn-based chess, but in chess you always take turns, and turn-based is such a rediculous word anyway. most accurate would be asynchronous chess since you are asynchronously able to play (both players need not be at the board at the same time). anyway, in the end we didn't know what to do and chose a word that people understand. it isn't perfect, but until we figure something else out, it sticks.
Thanks for explaining the historical roots, Eric. Good point, I'm afraid, about young folk and the word correspondence. Kinda sad, though.
After reading college seniors' essays during the '90s, and talking with business people, I advised my daughter to become an English major. Reason: It appears that a bachelor's degree in the U.S. is no longer assurance to people doing the hiring that an applicant can write. (E.g., I used to get this very often in essays: "They should of known . . .") Writing samples only purportedly from the applicant are no guarantee, either. But prospective employers know an English major can write.
Doonesbury, took somewhat of a shot at this correspondence generation gap in a recent panel in which Alex, a student at MIT, listens to her grandmother telling about having had to write hundreds of thank you notes once. Alex replies, "What's a thank you note?"
Here's a quick summary of alternative labels used for the two forms of chess - from another discussion:
Over The Board Chess
*apologises and runs for hills*
Alpha chess and Beta chess, surely.
Perhaps the two forms of chess can only be described obliquely, using metaphors and analogies, as illustrated in a recent discussion ...
I agree with the poster who said that comparing Correspondence Chess with Over-The-Board Chess is like comparing the 100-meter dash with a 26-mile marathon.
Did you ever meet a coach in any sport who would field one less player because he didn’t think it was right to use all that the rules allowed?
and its equally, or even more silly, to use such resources as a crutch whenever you find yourself in an unusual opening.
I'm driving a car and suddenly I find myself on ice, my passenger is an experienced ice driver and says "let me help", but you say "no, the only way I'll learn is to crash and burn".
playing correspondence chess and using databases as stopping my chess skills from getting a hunchback and a limp
Using this analogy, let's liken it to a student who actually learns spelling and one who is always reliant on his spell-check to clean his game up for him.
Your analogy of an in-class-open-book-exam is PERFECT!! Just as the person who depends on their spell-checker is a perfect analogy for the people who use the databases just as improperly.
I imagined some kind of like, pilots chair or bridge of the Enterprise set up with the ideal chess arrangement of data and stuff. Console with endgame tablebase displays and opening explorer and analysis board. Like, every utility at your fingertips, the ultimate chess machine.
you shouldn't try and reinvent the wheel. Instead, you should dedicate yourself to making a better wheel by utilizing the collective knowledge assembled by thousands of chess players
your not trying to make a better wheel :( your just mimicing a design proven to be effective.
Dating: gosh, wouldn't it be nice to just approach a girl normally?Oh, are all the other boys studying PUA (pick-up-artistry?). Well that means that I have to study it too if I want to get a girlfriend, doesn't it?
chess.com is like a professional baseball 'big' league. Rael and others wish it was 'junior' league. The players-who-try-too-hard poster wishes chess.com was 'kiddy' league. (p.s. I know nothing about baseball).
I think people who prefer to use the OTB style of play is like the professionals and the users are like T-ball players. They can't hit the ball or it would take them too long to hit the ball so lets put it on a tee in front of them so they can hit the ball .
Is there an athlete that doesn’t use shoes with spikes because it’s more pure? In any sport people use everything that’s allowed to perform better. And lots of them try to be better with help that’s not allowed.
Over-The-Board chess like performing a piece of music
OTB/CC hybrid chess like rehearsing a piece of music
Correspondence chess like recording a piece of music (in a sound studio)
To DB users especially the higher ranking ones (top seeds),if I had the chance to play with you and if I had the chance to have Deep Blue 2 (the only computer to beat KASPEROV),
To SATELLITE NAVIGATION users especially the higher ranking ones (top seeds): if I had the chance to drive against you and if I had the chance to have Military Level SATELLITE NAVIGATION
It would be like saying pick-up "american" football players are lazy because they don’t spend hours training for their game.
Every time I see "Circle of Trust" I imagine a bunch of Wiccan man-haters standing in a circle puttin' hexes on their exes.
Note: It's not my intention to disparage the group or it's members. Though I don't agree with the philosophy I respect your decision to abide by it. I just find the name very amusing!
I would compare using database with being allowed to use books when you have an exam at school, which would be great sometimes but...
And I would compare not using a database with trying to study for an exam without using books.
a user only uses one arm when cuddling, he uses someone else’s to complete the cuddle
No, I use the Kama Sutra to figure out my cuddling options...
I use my pea sized brain
It's a chicken and egg problem. Are highly rated players highly rated because they use databases or do they use databases because they're highly rated?
I have a competitive air rifle club and there are strict rules on what equipment my students can use in each category.
Imagine some people forming a group called "Only Shoot In Standing Position" and then arrogantly proclaiming themselves to be the only "purists" in the shooting world.
No improved labels yet seemingly?
artfizz is also known as the "threads reviver"
The names are unfortunate, a thorn in my side and a rock in my shoe.
Online Chess is actually offline chess, because you can logout from Chess.com, disconnect from the Internet, and still come back later to continue your game. That is offline play, clearly not online.
Email Chess was the correct name for this feature, because you are notified of your opponent's move via email.
The proper name for Live Chess is Online Chess, because you play it online. If you disconnect from the Internet, you forfeit your game.
You have to be online to play 'offline chess' as well!
I agree. I have always thought that the terms "Live Chess" and "Online Correspondence" were much more appropriate.
"Turn based" is useless since all chess is turn based. They could call 960 turn based. Or checkers for that matter, it's a completely stupid name.
The same can be said for "Online Chess"... it simply rules out checkers or tic tac toe.
"2016 NORWAY CHESS RECAP! with GM Hansen and GM Sokolov!"
Hurt/Heal World Champions
by Wagbruk 2 minutes ago
the 'join group' feature is kinda fishy
by Martin_Stahl 7 minutes ago
4/29/2016 - Bird's Opening, From's Gambit Analysis
by JoeyWoj 8 minutes ago
Chess rating system
by Martin_Stahl 10 minutes ago
by Wonderwomen2004 11 minutes ago
A Couple of Anti-Gruenfelds
by jengaias 19 minutes ago
4/30/2016 - Caught In A Web
by drabcoyote 19 minutes ago
Repertoire Help: Response to 1.e4
by troy7915 21 minutes ago
Why does blocking do so little?
by kaynight 23 minutes ago
Short - Collins
by RedAir 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!