14458 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
DID you see post 920..."Chess Restante''?
chess for dunderheads
Captures it nicely, but I had to look it up, so it's problematic in that respect.
Has intruiging elements then , and broadens the mind.Could be a rewarding gambit... bird in hand saves lot of b(l)eating about in bush !
How about CCC, Computer Corespondence Chess?
After fifty pages, I suggest Staff summarize the list to ten choices and call the question for a vote. Maybe eleven choices, including, "Who cares."
or 12 choices.. "We will choose what 'we' like the best, regardless of what the majority likes".
I don't think there is a good solution to the cheating problem.
I don't think you're in the right thread.
Online Correspondence Chess.Terrible? Too long?Then how about; " OC Chess " ?
I would amend your comment to the following: "or 12 choices.. 'We will choose what 'we' like the best, regardless of what Erik likes." After all, this site is in business for the profit of Erik but for the enjoyment of its members.
I wonder if any one is able to state at least three things that Traditional Correspondence Chess actually have in common with Online Chess here.
The only similarity I can find is the amount of time it takes.
So far all I got is that no one can deal with change. I await your failure.
You wouldn't use Correspondence Chess for someone nearby or in the same house even, but you certainly can do it here.
Non-concurrent? If you stay on the same page, how different is it from regular chess?
It's chess? So you couldn't think of a third one... :/
I'm coming to the conclusion that he's just trolling. Surely he can't be that obtuse without it being intentional.
I'm trolling? Maybe you should read the first post. ...and subsequent ones by the guy who runs the site. I suppose he's trolling too?
Yes, TheGrobe, chessplayer11 does seem to be just trolling, trying to show us how clever he can be. Too bad for him that cleverness is no substitute for sound, sensible reasoning. His approach to the naming issue is merely that of the sophist and yields results as specious as theirs were.
At least I've given reasons for my opinion. All you can do is cry like a child. Maybe if you hold your breath long enough you'll get your way.
I mean, you thought the survey was an election, so why not?
Well my friend, let's see the final outcome first, to see whose wording was more accurate. :)
Did anyone else not know that the site is actually owned and run by Erik and his partner Jay?
When I say his partner, I don't mean that sort of partner lol. I mean his business partner.
I only just realised that from stumbling across this forum.
Babs, the point of my comment was not accuracy in predicting which name will finally be chosen. You are quite right that the outcome remains to be seen. My guess is that the name chosen will be whatever Erik wants it to be. He obviously views the choice as being exclusively a matter of his own judicial prerogative, not a ministerial act done pursuant to the vote he held on the issue. But whatever name he chooses and the fact that he made the choice will not in any way confer any "accuracy" upon whatever term he does choose. My point was related to the question of whose preferences should be accommodated in the choice. In my opinion, they should be those of chess.com's customers as expressed in the results of the vote Erik took, which results clearly showed a strong preference among chess.com's members for "correspondence chess." After all, it is we who pay for the site. Without us and our money, it wouldn't even exist; and there would be nothing about it for anyone to name!
Is it possible to become a Master in under 6 months?
by mdinnerspace a few minutes ago
Was there a way forward?
by Fiveofswords a few minutes ago
Fried Liver Attack
by 1Alfonso4 7 minutes ago
by BigKingBud 7 minutes ago
A grandmaster losing to a 1600 in less than 15 moves
by Lasker1900 10 minutes ago
2/6/2016 - Pawn Attack
by TimZi 10 minutes ago
what's the point of 5...Be7 in the Ruy Lopez ?
by Lasker1900 11 minutes ago
Your first memory of chess ...
by Ziryab 13 minutes ago
The New Chess.com Review/ Feedback
by Ziryab 17 minutes ago
Saw this today...
by CoffehCat 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!