i didnt ask u for my grammar or aythn else bu just asking 4 tht move if u dont knw thn **** off
satemate....
Sort:
bu soldier honestly i didnt like tht rule at all if 1 hv no move so means thn checkmate, bu still thnx 4 rplying
AcivilizedGentleman wrote:
How come your grammar is so bad when you're from an English speaking nation?
"How come"...what sort of grammar is that?
Grousers gonna grouse
The king is not in check.
I hate it when after a comeback I end up with a draw due to poor planning. My basic strategy is to go for continuous check. Probably an amateur move on my part. Thinking would also work. Also I hate the "en passant" move but I'm trying to get over it.
Choked on my glass of water when i saw this ...
I will get you another glass.
To avoid stalemate.
See, it's very easy to avoid stalemate many times.
But if a player can plan and force you into getting
a stalemate then that is a good tactic.
Stalemate had been around hundreds and hundred of years and there is no way to eliminate it. There is also a draw when you don't have the correct pieces to mate
the other king. Then that is a draw. Also when someone
offer you a draw and it is accepted. That is a draw.
In your diagram the King is not in Check. It is just standing there and it can't move. To be in check another piece or pawn has to be in a position to take him. Of course the King can never be captured.
i knw its a rule bu really a silly 1 sorry so say tht bu it z looks bit silly n for me there is no draw lose or win only these 2 results cz if the opposit king cant make a move by any reason means thy lost the game
bu anyways thnx to all of u for rplying
[COMMENT DELETED]
i didnt get the point of stalemate coz in this stuation white king is on check from black pawn so he cant move his king n on the other block black king cant move coz of white king so why is it stalemate its ckeck mate istend of game draw????????????????