13898 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Most players don't need to think thirteen moves ahead. When you know a certain position leads to a loss, you play the best move you can.
Bd4 was obvious. The rest was forced. All you are doing is throwing pieces away to delay mate.
The point of a "mate in X" is that there is a mate in X moves, not more or less. These are not games, they are compositions using the rules of chess, more often used in struggles between two players or teams of players, to create an artistic effect--or, more so in the daily puzzles here, to demonstrate some tactical motif. If there is not a mate in X, then the problem is "cooked"--ruined by unintended moves not anticipated by the composer. Bd4, then Qxd4 after capturing that bishop, was what I suspect the composer of this one missed--a defense against mate along the diagonal.
There is NO mate in 5.
What the heck is this? After the several hours long delay, this is what you come up with? Come on.
I know it's a free service, but yeah you have to wonder why they do such a poor job when it would be so easy for them to do it much better.Maybe the daily puzzle person is just trying to get as many comments as possible. I have noticed that the puzzles generally get more comments whenever there is something really stupid that people want to point out, like the fact that this is not a mate in 4.
HAHAH good point, fella.
give us a hard one!
Is the puzzle broken?It says "You have solved this problem!" after white's 4th move.At that point, black can do 4. Bd4, 5.c3 x d4, 5.Qb6 x d4, and no mate!Or is it just me?
Yes. You are correct. The puzzle should be titled "Mate in 13". Check out post #190 for the correct solution with a diagram. You can use different move orders to get to the solution, but everything is pretty much forced. Interestingly enough, this puzzle was originally titled "Mate in 4" and then changed to "Mate in 5, which is still wrong!
Does Karjakin even have a "puncher's chance"?
by InfiniteFlash a few minutes ago
How long does it take to be a 2000 rate player?
by Daybreak57 a few minutes ago
8/19/2007 - Better Late Than Never :)
by BenGab 6 minutes ago
10/27/2016 - Backed In
by KID_Harish 7 minutes ago
Why didn't Fischer play Karpov
by wiscmike 26 minutes ago
Fair Play Policy
by MyRatingis1523 35 minutes ago
Question on types of rapid play
by MyRatingis1523 37 minutes ago
The difference between CPUs when analyzing chess games
by MyRatingis1523 38 minutes ago
Someone challenge me
by MyRatingis1523 40 minutes ago
The Einstein-Rosen spot (II)
by pampi_nero 48 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!