12941 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
this was amazing
I am not sure why Black would capture the White Queen, other than that it is a tantalizing piece. Black would be far better off to have moved away from the Queen than to have captured it. This puzzle should really be called Mate in 7.
I guess that's the reason they didn't call it Mate in 5 in the first place.
True. But the real issue is that Black is not making the 100% best moves. Whether the Puzzle is called Mate in 5, Mate in 7 or any other ambiguous title, Black still has to make the best moves possible in order to stave off Mate as long as possible.
I completely disagree. 1.Qxc6+ was easy to guess, but if black had played 1...Kb8??, then white, or actually rather the solver, would not have had to prove that he had calculated the only critical continuation. He would only have needed to prove that he has knowledge of earlier daily puzzles and thus sacrificed his queen. I currently went "wow, is it really Tuesday today" after clicking on the solution-button (yes, I coudln't think of black getting mated after his king "escapes" to d4.) However, if the continuation had been 1...Kb8, then I would probably have gone "have daily puzzles really subsided to the unrevised, computer-like level of the worst tactics trainer problems?"
However, I do agree with talerin - they couldn't call this a mate in five and have black take white's queen. That is not to say that the puzzle would have been good with a "mate in 7" title and 1...Kb8 - as a matter of fact, it would have been an utterly base-level puzzle then with 1...Kb8 and a unacceptably misleading puzzle after 1...Kxc6. However, as it is, the puzzle was wonderful, beautiful, and really instructive.
I hate sac'ing my lady. But after that, it was smooth sailin'.
Thanks I stumbled through it! great training!
TO DAILY PUZZLES - PLEASE, DON´T LOW THE LEVEL OF THE DAILY PUZZLES
aww,i needed help :(
Very good one.
Variety is the spice of life, good puzzle though.
This was a fun puzzle, thanks much.
very interesting one and thanks again to Incredibill for his good work on this one.
10/1/2016 - Fischer - Tal, Leipzig 1960, Modified
by joshdorn2000 2 minutes ago
Weighted Bullet Ratings?
by nimzomalaysian 3 minutes ago
Why did Bobby Fischer stopped playing chess
by bunicula 4 minutes ago
Bronstein's Mainline Queen Sac?!
by NimzoPatzer 4 minutes ago
robots on chess.com
by wanmokewan 12 minutes ago
A unique portable wood chessboard
by wiscmike 43 minutes ago
Flower vs. Cold Snapdragon!
by jeffreyni 60 minutes ago
9/30/2016 - Zohar Dror Vs. Daniel Perelman 2006, edited
by jeffreyni 63 minutes ago
Find The Best Move! (Rated 1450)
by kailaash91 65 minutes ago
"Pawn Sacrifice" the movie
by uscftigerprowl 67 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!