2/27/2012 - Mate in 2

shepi13
XBelkhalfiX wrote:
talosian wrote:

Mate in 5. I like doing these things. There may be other move options though.

 

 


It should certainly be mate in 3.

1250 and growing...


It's mate in 4 - black can block with the bishop to delay a move.

bhut_jolokia

 Waaaaay too easy.

ErikDavis

Way too easy!  

Rust_Blade

ohh, Bxf7... THEN Qe6 is mate

FredBatchelor

Mighty fine.

UFP117

very easy

Fallonme
briansladovich wrote:

 Now that was a little too easy.


Right you are

Dust_N_Bones

A bit too obvious methinks.

asdqwe258

easy

Zeyu

easy :)

Easeland

Too Easy! Monday Is Why.

MartinUKL

These puzzles are great fun and appreciated. I wonder though if the 'Mate in _ ' could be substituted for a title that does not give the game away (eg the two players puzzles). Already knowing the amount of moves you tend to look at the board for a logical solution to match the clue, this would not happen in a chess game. Does anyone agree?.

DudeDude88

wow so easy i didn't attempt it. I just did it with my eyes.

RafaelBCK

Well, duh!

pawnstalkerz

finally a puzzle that i got rite the first time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YEAAAEAEAEAEAAAE!!!!!!!!!!!

Lego_master

SIMPLE

fireflies808

THAT, WAS LIKE, SO EASY! (not)

lol!

playatyourownrisk

yawn

Tom

WOW!!!! What a puzzle!!  You really have to put your thinking caps on for this one folks!

gerfinn
MartinUKL wrote:

These puzzles are great fun and appreciated. I wonder though if the 'Mate in _ ' could be substituted for a title that does not give the game away (eg the two players puzzles). Already knowing the amount of moves you tend to look at the board for a logical solution to match the clue, this would not happen in a chess game. Does anyone agree?.


Great idea!