13434 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Rook g8 works as well.
pretty easy but a nice practice
nice and easy
love ur title
good one indeed.
har har har
Quite good puzzle made better by an interesting thread. I had trouble finding the first move for a little while & considered Qxc6 but then saw the threat from d4 & realised it was no good: So why some people propose it as a valid alternative is beyond me - the given solution is a forced mate in 4. I don't see how you can improve on that unless you can find one in 3 !
'slowhare', I think you found yourself having the wrong argument & with the wrong opponent on this one - 'ndskykng' always defends his corner well & that's no bad thing.
And by the way, I think that in your longer solution (post #151) you may have missed a quicker mate at move 16: Try Rxa7#.
easy. but i never thought about back rank like that before!
Appreciate that Stephen. That's all I was trying to get across to slow... that his alternative wasn't a move that works also, not like a mate-in-4. It never should have escalated like that.
Good eye on move 16. I never calculated that far cause I saw the pressure building on that back rank by queen+rook, I knew I was losing a rook anyway and felt I shouldn't waste an escape move and should take a pawn down with me. But yeah, if it got there, then 16. Rxa7# (or 16. Qxa7#) would have worked. Nice catch.
Another queen sac for da chess daddy mac. :)
it was okay
Lose to Win . A prefect game!!!!
I have no problem with skyking defending his corner, although he misread my intention and comes off condescending as usual. I solved the puzzle right off, but saw another interesting possibility when analyizing it and pointed it out on page one. Never did I say it was a better solution and even showed the queens only way out. Why not make a play like that in a game when your winning chance is assured and the possibility that your opponent will not see their only way of survival or resign. Skyking likes the banter and I just keep playing his tune for my own fun.
Why not make a play like that (1. Qe6+) in a game when your winning chance (mate-in-4) is assured and the possibility that your opponent will not see their only way of survival (cause it doesn't exist) or resign (because mate is coming in four).
So much better when you make my point for me.
not as bad as yesterday
Chess Life, January 1959
by wb_munchausen a few minutes ago
Queens gambit vs kings gambit
by slowdeath22 a few minutes ago
by rraju_lutheran 19 minutes ago
The ultimate 1 second battle - Quality Vs Quantity
by CaloNord 20 minutes ago
Advantages and Weakness
by spawkle529 22 minutes ago
what should i play after 1.e4 , but not the sicillian. i hate the sicilllian.
by enriqueebe 27 minutes ago
Who is the greatest chess player of all time ?? Bobby Fischer ??
by JQX07 29 minutes ago
Could you give me some advices about my opening repertoire?
by btl1230 36 minutes ago
by shadowcat53 36 minutes ago
POOR CUSTOMER SERVICE.
by RonaldJosephCote 38 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!