12250 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Wouldn't 1.Qh5+ frist; also, transfer into just as quick a mating
(I messed up. My response is in the quote box.)
No.1.Qh5+ Kfg8If 2.f7+, then ... Kg7 and if 3.Qchecks K, 3....Kxf7 and escapesWhite's best move is 3.Rf1, protecting the pawn while the queen chases the black king. Black can use the tempo to move his Bishop (to d6 or e7) giving his rook coverage of the full 8th rank and double covering white's promotion square f8.
White's victory is uncertain, and it certainly is not mate-in-3.
Somehow, I ended up posting my comment in the quote box. It threw me off completely in trying to analyze the outcome if white moved 1. Qh5+ instead of 1.f7. It is a difficult analysis, because white's best move after 1. ... Kg8 is 2. Qg6+ (back to the original position). Trying to fashion a win for white after a sequence of less than optimal moves is difficult, especially since white has opened up many variations for black, and the game is probably decided by who makes the NEXT mistake.
I was correct the first time!
This says to please be helpful and nice.
I have a hard time here.
Recreating the original position with 2. Qg6+ looks fine, without any variations. The mate is just extended by two.
Hehe, people ignore the suggestion of "Please be relevant"
HELLO KELLEY. HELLO EVAN. DAD IS ENGAGED.
nice and easy
Tentatively advanced the pawn & only then saw the solution. Better to have to think harder though - not very challenging.
Awesome.Please be relevant, helpful & nice!
I doubt it that you use 2 peices only
advance a weak peice to a spetacular peice
What is you chess resolution for the new year (2016)?
by SpiritoftheVictory a few minutes ago
My first analysis
by Improvingforever 4 minutes ago
The Backyard Professor
by SpiritoftheVictory 5 minutes ago
Players, Punks and Pussilanimous Losers
by SophiePawn 5 minutes ago
by nitoyistheone 6 minutes ago
Bishops are not better than Knights
by AlCzervik 8 minutes ago
by newengland7 19 minutes ago
Vintage circa 1890s British Chess Company Set used at Hastings Chess Congress
by goodknightmike 24 minutes ago
Who will win Candidates 2016
by Vibhav_G 25 minutes ago
2/9/2016 - Tempo Time
by szammie 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!