4/8/2012 - Mate in 2


  • 4 years ago · Quote · #101

    shon0324

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #102

    donce83

    very, very, very, very easy

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #103

    carlosmadura

    easy

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #104

    JuanIvan

    This one was really easy,but nice!

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #105

    Samer-Syr

    very

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #106

    Samer-Syr

    easy

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #107

    Samer-Syr

    one

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #108

    VULPES_VULPES

    MethEmatics wrote:

    even jesus got this one. . .and hes a zombie!

    Two things:

    1. How would it matter if Jesus could solve this puzzle when he is the son of God who created the universe and everything in it? He, like God, knows everything, so your statement provides no meaning whatsoever.

    2. Jesus is not a zombie. A zombie is a reanimated dead person or animal who hungers for one's brains (the stereotypical zombie, that is)--which Jesus is not because he was resurrected (made alive again) from the dead, not reanimated.

    I apologize if you are joking, but your statement could have offended certain people, as did me. 

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #109

    allenzhang01

    that was easy!

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #110

    cammus

    VULPES_VULPES wrote:
    MethEmatics wrote:

    even jesus got this one. . .and hes a zombie!

    Two things:

    1. How would it matter if Jesus could solve this puzzle when he is the son of God who created the universe and everything in it? He, like God, knows everything, so your statement provides no meaning whatsoever.

    2. Jesus is not a zombie. A zombie is a reanimated dead person or animal who hungers for one's brains (the stereotypical zombie, that is)--which Jesus is not because he was resurrected (made alive again) from the dead, not reanimated.

    I apologize if you are joking, but your statement could have offended certain people, as did me. 

    I'm not much of a religious person, but I'm one of those offended. And I'm with you 100%, in both points. Well said!

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #111

    deepak21071974

    hmm:)

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #112

    cammus

    Grigorios wrote:

    Is there any difference in

    1. Bf5+ Kg8

    2. Qh7#

    Yes, there is. If 1. Bf5+, it wouldn't be 1. .., Kg8, but Qh6 blocking the white queen attack.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #113

    leonelcm

    A winning position, thanx for sharing...

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #114

    abekiroz

    nice one

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #115

    Mr_Mallard

    too easyFrown

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #116

    fireflies808

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #117

    cfrench49

    Good puzzle.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #118

    ndskykng

    FIREFLIES wrote:
    Gepy wrote:

    1. Bg6+ Kg8

    2. Qh7++

    :-)

    #!!! it's #!!! not ++!!

    Wow, chill out and relax.

    I agree with you, it's the USCF recommendation to use # for mate; but maybe he's from a different country that uses an older notation, where ++ is used to notate mate.  Here's an article so you can see that some people still use it this way.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkmate

    It's not worth stressing out over people that use an older form of notation.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #119

    SirDonald

    Nice Puzzle.  Thanks so much.  Happy Easter!

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #120

    shahronakm

    Easy one.


Back to Top

Post your reply: