6/14/2012 - Mate in 3


  • 4 years ago · Quote · #201

    Genghis_McCann

    wasn't that mate in 5?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #202

    diontd

    Hey, the title is mate in 3, but it is mate in 5!!!

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #203

    skilledwolf

    The mate in 3 title messed me up for a minute.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #204

    FredBatchelor

    Mighty fine.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #205

    skaahaha

    mate in 5

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #206

    bluejam

    smothered

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #207

    MartinUKL

    Devious!

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #208

    erowe1

    Why does this say "Mate in 3"?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #209

    beltawil

    Nice and easy and had more moves than the average puzzles

    I want more of those!

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #210

    justo84

    same ol smothered mate

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #211

    ambpawns

    that is not mate in 3

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #212

    abusch38

    Did anyone else notice it was mate in 5 not mate in 3?

    Now that I'm on page 12, I see the rest of you did.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #213

    abekiroz

    very nice

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #214

    etothepi

    wait, mate in three, but it took 5 moves?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #215

    Mudhatter

    really really nice and insightfull

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #216

    tanmay_chakrabarti

    good one indeed.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #217

    DrB127

    Mate in 5, not 3

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #218

    behapu

    Mate in 5.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #219

    chess_rooks

    We don't know until its coming...

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #220

    pbazan

    It is not in three, is in five! Nice!!


Back to Top

Post your reply: