6/14/2012 - Mate in 3

skilledwolf

The mate in 3 title messed me up for a minute.

FredBatchelor

Mighty fine.

skaahaha

mate in 5

bluejam

smothered

MartinUKL

Devious!

erowe1

Why does this say "Mate in 3"?

beltawil

Nice and easy and had more moves than the average puzzles

I want more of those!

justo84

same ol smothered mate

ambpawns

that is not mate in 3

abusch38

Did anyone else notice it was mate in 5 not mate in 3?

Now that I'm on page 12, I see the rest of you did.

abekiroz

very nice

etothepi

wait, mate in three, but it took 5 moves?

Mudhatter

really really nice and insightfull

tanmay_chakrabarti

good one indeed.

DrB127

Mate in 5, not 3

behapu

Mate in 5.

chess_rooks

We don't know until its coming...

pbazan

It is not in three, is in five! Nice!!

nagesh001

very nice

quandry00735
[COMMENT DELETED]