21318 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I'm up it's 2:11 AM
Remember white is a rook down, plus a pawn, in the original position so simply recovering the rook with a bishop pair advantage is not best.
I'm alright to go
Also a Qh1
When I examine something like this, I never assume a blatant mistake such as the opposing player leaving the rook out there for the taking. It was not a worthy "sacrifice". Why would I plan on such a bad move as the opposing knight move (Nc6) when the black rook is screaming "get me outta here!"? I must be missing something because others seem to be impressed. Hmmmmm!
If the rook moves instead of 2...Nc6 then 3. Bxb7 wins the queen immediately, unless 2...Rd1+. Then 3. Rxd1 wins the first rook followed by at least the other rook on the next move. If 3...Nc6 4. Bxc6 would win at least both rooks and the knight.
Go for the win.
If 1. Bxd5 Qxd5 2. Qxe7 Nd7 avoids getting checkmated.
Everybody try...answer soon..
Mate in 2
I have realized what you are thinking and it will never happen for me.
What happened? The position changed!
Evrybody try this mate in 2...answer will come out soon...
If 1. Bf6 then where's the mate on 1...Rh8?
ummm... oops? lol thanks for pointing that out!
HAHA I just saw the revision, there was supposed to be a knight on h8 so that 1. ...Rh8 wouldnt be possible, it seems there would be no mate in 2 on with the original position, but that is probably still the line I would take lol
In the revision I think 1. Bf6 can be met by 1...Ng6, holding the critical h4 and f4 squares. Unless I am missing something, I don't see any mate in two with any first move. Please correct me if i'm wrong. Maybe it needs to be revised another time!
Hard and solvable.
Good one...also yours E-Kuko. Thanx for posting it!
Change of Pace to have a non-mating puzzle
Hurt/Heal World Champions
by condude2 a few minutes ago
Are the chess.com staff biased against MSC?
by thecentipede a few minutes ago
dont disconnect on purpose warning
by Don_frye1 a few minutes ago
5/6/2016 - Nezhmetdinov - Ermolin, Kazan 1946
by maacos 3 minutes ago
Which Dubrovnik Set do you like betterChessBazaar or House of Staunton?
by Ronbo710 4 minutes ago
Thoughts or whatever?
by wesleypickles 5 minutes ago
Best book for teaching post-beginner kid
by EscherehcsE 6 minutes ago
by petrikeckman 7 minutes ago
by pfren 8 minutes ago
How over-rated are tactics trainer ratings?
by mcmodern 8 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!