24031 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I'm up it's 2:11 AM
Remember white is a rook down, plus a pawn, in the original position so simply recovering the rook with a bishop pair advantage is not best.
I'm alright to go
Also a Qh1
When I examine something like this, I never assume a blatant mistake such as the opposing player leaving the rook out there for the taking. It was not a worthy "sacrifice". Why would I plan on such a bad move as the opposing knight move (Nc6) when the black rook is screaming "get me outta here!"? I must be missing something because others seem to be impressed. Hmmmmm!
If the rook moves instead of 2...Nc6 then 3. Bxb7 wins the queen immediately, unless 2...Rd1+. Then 3. Rxd1 wins the first rook followed by at least the other rook on the next move. If 3...Nc6 4. Bxc6 would win at least both rooks and the knight.
Go for the win.
If 1. Bxd5 Qxd5 2. Qxe7 Nd7 avoids getting checkmated.
Everybody try...answer soon..
Mate in 2
I have realized what you are thinking and it will never happen for me.
What happened? The position changed!
Evrybody try this mate in 2...answer will come out soon...
If 1. Bf6 then where's the mate on 1...Rh8?
ummm... oops? lol thanks for pointing that out!
HAHA I just saw the revision, there was supposed to be a knight on h8 so that 1. ...Rh8 wouldnt be possible, it seems there would be no mate in 2 on with the original position, but that is probably still the line I would take lol
In the revision I think 1. Bf6 can be met by 1...Ng6, holding the critical h4 and f4 squares. Unless I am missing something, I don't see any mate in two with any first move. Please correct me if i'm wrong. Maybe it needs to be revised another time!
Hard and solvable.
Good one...also yours E-Kuko. Thanx for posting it!
Change of Pace to have a non-mating puzzle
I feel like punching my opponent in the face after losing
by ANOK1 3 minutes ago
Sicilian Defense F4 line?
by CNoahSay 7 minutes ago
The SER board explained
by JamesAgadir 9 minutes ago
10/26/2016 - What's Better Than Winning A Queen?
by vanhafford 10 minutes ago
How many forum topics?
by RonaldJosephCote 10 minutes ago
R. RETI, un Genio Olvidado-Cap. V-Lucha entre 2 piezas Heterogenes-Est. 31
by luis_albert 10 minutes ago
Does Karjakin even have a "puncher's chance"?
by LauriAikio 12 minutes ago
Typical Draw (Sorry)
by chessperson2222222 12 minutes ago
Who is your favorite chess.com player other than yourself
by Dark_Army 23 minutes ago
The notion that <1000 is awful?
by alexm2310 31 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!