Interesting Combination/Trap Thingy


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #1

    ivandh

    Probably the longest combination I've ever played:


    (of course I went on to drop a rook... c'est la vie)

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #2

    pdela

    Laughing

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #3

    ivandh

    Oh, I didn't know they all had to be forced. In that case it's the longest sequence of moves involved in a tactical exchange in which I came out ahead in material.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #4

    ivandh

    Yeah, ok. I lumped it together because after the first exchange, Rad8 would appear, at first glance, to be a very logical continuation (rook on open file and pushes back the knight), and this was the main reason I played the first exchange, to try to set up the second one.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #5

    jingylima

    can't black play 24....Nf7+?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #6

    TetsuoShima

    i love how you say "trap thingy"

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #7

    jingylima

    oh.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #8

    pdela

    ivandh making friends

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #9

    TheGrobe

    The difference being that comment was in context in your thread.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #10

    pdela

    TheGrobe wrote:

    The difference being that comment was in context in your thread.

    and who decides that? If we get into an argument here now the thread will be derailed and everything would be on topic, then moderators will lock the thread and then you have no longer thread because some people have decided so.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #11

    TheGrobe

    Well, let me see, this thread is about chess.  666AAA666's post is completely out of left field and doesn't make any sense out side of its retaliatory intent.

    666AAA666's thread was a beligerent tirade about how he felt slighted by a user in a thread that got locked, and as a result by chess.com that descended in him insulting anyone who responded (including, now, coming into their threads to harass them as seen above).

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #12

    pdela

    TheGrobe wrote:

    Well, let me see, this thread is about chess.  666AAA666's post is completely out of left field and doesn't make any sense out side of its retaliatory intent.

    666AAA666's thread was a beligerent tirade about how he felt slighted by a user in a thread that got locked, and as a result by chess.com that descended in him insulting anyone who responded (including, now, coming into their threads to harass them as seen above).

    He made a claim I agree with, if some thread is deliberately derailed, MODs should have to delete the uncalled posts and then OPs should block users instead of lock threads here, there and there. And that is what should happen with this very own thread

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #13

    ivandh

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #14

    TheGrobe

    Wow, self immolation.

    Delicious.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #15

    ivandh

    Nice and crispy.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #16

    pdela

    Sorry, I made a mistake in what I said before, in this case the thread should be just locked

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #17

    ivandh

    Why? People may want to talk about the combination/trap thingy and/or circus waffles.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #18

    pdela

    or they may want the thread locked


Back to Top

Post your reply: