HI_iwant_to_get_2000 wrote:
and if you have brain you might have solved it btw
That seems degrading. It is better not to shame a chess player, but to teach them.
Rooks vs Pawn
Sort:
17 days ago
0
#23
My teacher told me that it's a draw if there are 2 pawns..
What about if they are separated ?
pisgeYooo wrote:
My chess teacher told me that 2 pawns is still a draw until 3 pawns
I think if the 2 pawns are disconnected it might be drawable, but if they are connected it is impossible with perfect play.
pisgeYooo wrote:
My teacher told me that it's a draw if there are 2 pawns..
What about if they are separated ?
In most cases this is a win too- an exception is the f and h pawns, where Black has fair drawing chances with his king in front of the pawns.
Here, even not caring about the d4 pawn wins easily- 1.Kf6 Rxd4 2.f5 and it will result at a Lucena position, which is elementary endgame knowledge.
If your teacher said to you that R+2P vs R is a draw, just fire him- yesterday.
White's pawns are connected and his king is strongly placed ahead of his pawns. He should win easily
 :thinker
pisgeYooo wrote:
My teacher told me that it's a draw if there are 2 pawns..
It's time to get rid of that "teacher" and find a real one.
Also, it would take you almost no effort to click on the analysis button and see what the engine thinks.
bro bec 2 pawns + rook vs rook is not enough to draw
its always win
and if you have brain you might have solved it btw