12353 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Agree TCEC, also 7. Nc3 is a tactical mistake you could have taken advantage of.
ok thanks for that i try to analyse the games in fritz but it always says certain moves are wrong but never why,it all seems like guesswork to be honest
There were mistakes on both sides in the opening. Note that you have a very good endgame after 15.Bf4. In the endgame, the king becomes an attacking piece, there is no need to try to hide it on the baseline, disturbing your rooks. Just activate your pieces (for example, 15...Rhe8) and you'll be fine.
very helpful thanks everyone i have just gone through what you said and now learnt that 16..kf8 was a big mistake which will help me in future games much appreciated thanks for your time
at what point in the game should i start using the king as an attacking piece instead of keeping it castled away?
Depends on the position (as always), usually when there is not enough material left to seriously annoy your king.
that was another game i played today that i actually won i played as white but i still struggled
Addition: Note that f6 is very fine for your king since it's a dark square (your opponent has a light bishop, you don't) and not on an open file where a rook can attack it.
Was there anything wrong with 4...Nxe4
No, of course not.
yeah thats something else sred that i didnt think about during the game and i should have,thing is at 1 time about 6 months ago my elo rating had gone up to like 1760 on online 3 day games and now im struggling to hit 1300 and im practicing more
that was on a different app though and i dont think the elo ratings on there are very accurate
4. O-Od7d5 ? Too Soon for a Black Player! better to play 4. Bc5 with Pressure on the D4 Square! & Castle as Soon as Possible!!
I just checked this in my database, as it seemed "ok" to me, and I think I'm right as 14 rated players made this move, with black winning a "reasonable" percentage of games. I think d5 is a very promising move, taking control of the centre, but perhaps it made you over-confident...
I think the real problems come at around move 7... you have a N and B sitting undefended in the middle of the board. And after 8... another N joins them... so that's all four minor pieces you have hanging in space with no support... It makes me giddy just looking at it...
I think you only came out well because your opponent let you fork his R & Q. If he'd played 10.RxP+ I think that also has you also losing at least one bishop.
Why not 7...bd6 rather than 7...bc4, then your bishop is developed *and* defended, *and* defends a pawn.
I used to lose pieces often in these kinds of exchanges I've become very defensive and it's paying off. So i'd definitely play 7... bd6 (I love that move!) and would be thinking strongly about retreating N when it's attacked (another favourite...)
Note this is referring to the first game. (Put new games in new threads, otherwise you end up with another combinatorial nightmare )
Rule O: Safety first!
4...d5 is risky (borderline unsound), but playable. I have won a game as Black with it in just 16 moves.
But Black has to play more actively... 6...Be6? drops the e5 pawn for nothing (no idea why white did not gobble it), 6...Bc5 is a must.
EDIT: Just noticed that white hasn't even played d2-d3 yet, so the whole Black concept is rubbish. Black could (and should) play 4...Nxe4, with a fine game.
Why not 6...Bd6 to defend the e5 pawn? Then 7...O-O? Doesn't 6...Bc5 risk the B being attacked by the pawn, and the Q coming out after the exchange? I just read that Lasker didn't like pinning the Q, but the article didn't give a reason.
EDIT: Or was that "didn't like pinning the Q *before castling*". I now see that to chase the bishop away white would have to wreck his K side pawn fortress. Before castling he could do this (as in the Ruy Lopez) and castle Q side.
P.S. Blimey this game is difficult...
Looking to play with good player tonight!
by okPANDA 2 minutes ago
Wild Chess Imagery
by ChessPlayinDude47 3 minutes ago
Member Analysis Auditions
by mohammmmmad93 3 minutes ago
How To Use Computer for Analysis
by notmtwain 6 minutes ago
5/28/2016 - [Smyslov - Fischer, Yugoslavia 1959
by Ratiti 8 minutes ago
Your games shallowly and pessimistically analyzed by some guy.
by cats-not-knights 9 minutes ago
5/28/2016 - Overworked and Under Paid
by HellHamster 12 minutes ago
Help Analyzing Unusual Variation of Slav Defense
by Lasker1900 13 minutes ago
Looking for Mentor to play chess with
by okPANDA 17 minutes ago
Magnus vs Fisher, who would win
by RandomBean 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!