15061 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is live chess, but no time controls are given. However, it amazes me how, in non-blitz time controls, players (myself included) can make deep moves that account for most replies and complications and even gain a winning advantage, but then miss the most obvious moves or make moves that miss the most obvious responses and throw away that advantage in a heartbeat. Maybe one of the biggest differences between levels of play in consistency.
Reminds me of me before I hired my team of strategic advisors (aka "army of hopefuls")
Time control is 5 minutes.
Well, then mistakes are expected. A very good blitz game.
I despise blitz with a passion.
I played at the Marshall Chess Club and had five pawns and a queen against my opponents king. I had ten seconds to mate and lost on time.
Then he made some comment like: "Oh, I must be the better player because I won this game."
Freaking smug bastard!
I thrashed the guy in two games, and then he acts like he's God in the last one.
When chess is nothing but a race, it's not worth playing.
It's similar also to that time I played where my opponent sacrificed all his major pieces to save a few seconds so I would lose on time.
It worked. He won the race, but had a losing position. At least he could justify himself on winning.
Five minutes isn't too bad on the internet. It's almost impossible for me in the physical world.
@ Yereslov: just consider the source and move on.
Don't try to mock me. This thread can be about anything.
You must new on forums.
Do You Think That Chess and Bowling Are Related?
by AussieRookie 2 minutes ago
Analysis board - how do I understand it?
by MTCicero2 3 minutes ago
If You Could Go to Dinner with Any Chess Player, Who'd You Pick?
by stuzzicadenti 4 minutes ago
Vintage 1940's English Made Set Possibly Jaques?
by goodknightmike 4 minutes ago
8/26/2016 - Kouatly - Tsheshkovsky, Hoogovens 1988
by MeherzanG 5 minutes ago
by IMperf_X_ion00 5 minutes ago
HUMORISTIC FUNNY CHESS PICS, IMAGES, CARICATURES, ETC...
by AaronGo 7 minutes ago
Has a king move ever delivered checkmate (in a serious game?)
by AussieRookie 11 minutes ago
Willie Nelson v Ray Charles
by AaronGo 11 minutes ago
8/24/2016 - Shock And Awe
by DanielsBeterThnHeath 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!