Forums

Cool attacking game!

Sort:
BorpB0rpImA737
[Site "??"]
[Date "??/??/??"]
[White "Me (??)"]
[Black "NN (??)"]

1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 Bc5 4.d4 Bb6 5.Bxf4 Nf6 6.Nc3 Ng4 7.h3 Ne3 8.Bxe3 Qe7 9.Bg5 Qe6 10.d5 Qd6 11.e5 Qc5 12.Ne4 Qb4+ 13.Nfd2 Qxb2 14.Nc4 Qd4 15.Bd3 d6 16.exd6 cxd6 17.Qf3 Qxa1+ 18.Ke2 Qxh1 19.Nexd6+ Kd7 20.Qxf7# {Me wins by Checkmate}
BorpB0rpImA737
How can I improve?
BorpB0rpImA737

Halo
corum

 

corum

You could start by putting the game in the format above so people can easily see it. It takes less than 10 secs to do. Just click on the chess board when you are typing a msg and paste the pgn data (the data you posted) in.

 

corum

But there is a more serious reason why you are unlikely to get a response. 

 

If someone posts a game they lost and ask people to help them understand why they lost or what their weakness are, the community here (which is mainly friendly and supportive) will try to help. I myself have often spent more than an hour analysing someone's game who I don't even know just so I can help out. If you try to analyse your own game first and suggest what the problems might be you get extra bonus points and people are even more likely to help.

However, when you post a game that you won, and won quite easily, and say "please help me improve?", then it is a false modesty. You are not really looking for help. You are looking to show off, for people to say, 'wow - what fantastic play!', 'how come you are not already a GM?' 

It's just my view. But shared by many I guess. And It's why you won't get many responses. 

corum

In fact, when I look at your previous posts and see that you claimed that one of your previous games as an 'immortal game' and that, in another post, you asked for advice but said, don't talk about my bad moves. Well, ....

Daybreak57

He's just a troll dude.  Plain and simple.

Daybreak57

His favorate past time is to waste his own time while hoping to waste the time of others.  He wasted 1 minute of my time, but he wasted even more, so it's his loss.

BorpB0rpImA737
17.Qf3!! was a pretty good move though, right?
Rat1960

Yes 17. Qf3 was a very nice move.

As for the game black let you play d4 with tempo and then dumped a piece.
Move 9. I would not have.
Piece up you should get the rest of your pieces developed and put the king in the corner.
What was the plan if black played 15. ... Qxd5 and would then have two pawns for the piece and able to castle as well as ... Nc6 attacking the pawn and maybe just maybe gets the bishop into play.

BorpB0rpImA737
If Qxd5 I'm so ahead in development I'm easily winning anyways.
Rat1960

"How can I improve? "
Firstly, as a btw, do not judge me by looking at my online playing record (zero) I only ever play OTB
Secondly I can read.
If what you *really* want is hey guys what do you think of this double rook sacrifice that leads to mate,
then yeah, love it!!
If what you want is "How can I improve" then move 9. is a lemon.
Second, prove your case with move analysis, not I'm winning easily (+4 I would guess from move 8). The more you think about variations the stronger you are.
The only bloke who can drop a piece in the opening and win is the WC, as he showed at Tata last week.
Of course if you had engaged, I would have suggested what if 15. ... h6 ; 16. ... Qxd5
That is are you sacrificing on d6 or is your bottle going and NxB or really going Rf1 or would you go with say Qg4. As long as black has Qf2 mate (but for the N on e4) and you have no where to go with your king then black has counter blunder chances.