12605 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Can you point out the flaws in black's game
7...b5 isn't the greatest variation to play, but it is doable. The game-losing mistake was 13...Qb6?? when 13...Qxe5 is perfectly fine for black.
@ FirebrandX, Is 7 ...Qb6 better ?
And you are right about 13 .... Qxe5 instead of Qb6, as my engine suggests that 13 Qg4 is not a good idea as after Qg4 Qxe5 black gains an advantage of +1.51, while with Qb6 black ends up with -4.10 after 14 Rd6, which is a huge and decisive difference.
7...Qb6 rather, leads to the Poison Pawn variation. It's the sharpest of all the Sicilian lines, and probably the sharpest of any opening. Also playable are 7...Be7, 7...Nbd7, and 7...Qc7.
Start looking openings up in the Game Explorer. You can compare what you played with what masters have played in identical positions and what lines are popular and which ones aren't. This one is B96: Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Polugayevsky Variation
it's extremely tactical and complicated (as you may have noticed) and probably not the best opening to work on - yet. The great hypermodern GM Richard Reti in his classic "Masters of the Chessboard" recommends beginners play Double KP Openings whenever possible - as both White and Black.
Is 13 Qg4 a good move ? Can't it be easily nullified by Qxe5
It's a fine move. And to be honest, the continuation is quite crazy for both sides:
Black is technically holding, but this line looks to be a bad choice for beginners. I'd rather play something a little more structure-based than this crazy stuff.
I'm not one for engines just to say (nothing wrong with them but I'm not at a point where I can benefit as a player using them)... but I'm assuming that this is because black would have destoryed white's central pawn which was the backbone of whites attack. Black had to work it's development around the pawn since it controlled 2 useful squares. (This is beyond tactical play. This is just fundamental.)
This can serve as a lesson as to why dominating the center can give you so many options. You can choose which side to innitiate an attack on.
That's Mikhail Tal's game.
That's Mikhail Tal's game.
Yes, you are correct, I saw this game in a youtube video. Really amazing that you can recognize it!
Yeah I know lots of his games by heart :)
Kasparov is slaughtering Nakamura and So.
by BettorOffSingle a few minutes ago
by bunicula 3 minutes ago
Minor piece sacrifice for castling rights
by Pursuantspy 5 minutes ago
by RonaldJosephCote 8 minutes ago
Chess.com's Weekly Study: January 17th 2016
by fightingbob 9 minutes ago
SCID vs PC
by fuzzbug 10 minutes ago
The Sicilian Dragon
by 1stKnight619 10 minutes ago
why do GMs lose
by etc2000chess 14 minutes ago
Chatting and Chess
by rmanthony 24 minutes ago
4/25/2016 - Lengyel - Brink-Claussen, Varna 1962
by Newba 41 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!