12563 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
-What would have you done differently here?-Why?
-Do you notice something wrong?-Any comments on 7.Be3?
Keep in mind that its my 2nd-3rd game playing KIA and that i like to 'experiment' with closed positions.
on move 10 I would have played 10.Ng5 with the idea of playing f3 or f4 next.
move 13. f3 again with the idea playing f4
move 21. Nb6, with the idea of Ke2,d2,c2,b3,a4 its a long way
i hope this helps a bit.
7) seems fine, the other option is the somewhat meaningless pin on the knight, both develop the piece. Nc3 is possible as well. I cant see that any is much better than another.
12) I would not have taken that bishop yet. I prefer the pressure of having the knight in deep to the exchange.
I probably would have tried 13) Nc4 first.
I may have tried 15) RxN, QxB, etc. I make no claim that it is any better, but I probably would have done it that way, its a free rook lift and maybe can find a way to battery.
after all the exchanges its tough. You have to manuver looking to get a pawn advantage... and that requires either a mistake or getting ahead of the other guy with your king, or something, maybe sac a piece for 2 pawns somehow. Its drawish, made worse by each pawn move after 20. Had one side been more bold with its pawns, willing to risk going for the win, it could have played out for one or the other side.
Anyway I see nothing terrible here, biggest thing are pointless trades that do not provide either side with any advantage, which of course leads to draws...
The pawn sacrifice 16. Bd5 was an interesting alternative.
Thank you for your comments guys.I ll take a closer look on the ideas soon!
@Jonnin:Most crucial mistake i think it was that i expected him to give a specific answer. 13 .. h6 instead of 13..Ng4(a move that i didnt even consider). After that i was planning to play f4 opening the file.Pilling up there,probly a rook lift or something like that.
In a sense,it wasnt pointless trades.It was a misscalculation and i m really glad you pointed that out as i really need to stop doin that (did it 3 times here :P).
Sacing a piece for 2 pawns was an idea i had 2,but i couldnt find any good continuation and was really afraid of it.
@humans1981:The idea after 21..Nb6 is a good one!But when i thought about it during the game was 2 late for that.
At my lvl (1300ish standar chess(30|0)) there are not many chances to play a closed game as ppl tend to grab everything you throw in their face.So i was somehow addicted to the idea of locking the game and playing for that small Knight advantage.
Gotta control my emotions better and be watching for more alternatives and answers that i could possibly miss.
Once again,thank you for your time and answers!
"bishops of the same color indicates that exchanging Knights is not good for any of us" : huh ? It has to be good for either layer, or neutral, but it can't possibly be bad for both ! Your suggested 28...b6 would finish the entombing of his bishop (in same-colored bishops endgame, the pawns should in 99% of the cases go on the color opposite to the bishop). It seems to me that despite that problem, Black can blockade the position after the knight trade. (and he did, but with some help...)
32.h4 ? is indeed a pointless move - 32...gxh4 is on check so it (temporarily) wins a pawn. But it's still a draw.
You were focused on his "weak" Knight on c6 (it doesn't look weak to me). In my view you should've been much more focused on your good Bishop vs. his bad Bishop. Instead you allowed the position to get completely locked up making your very good Bishop absolutely useless.
13.Bg5 is pointless. Anything but this. a4, h3, Nc4 I would consider before this move.
20.Kxf1, this position is most likely drawn but you have tries in here.
22.g4 taking space is a good move.
26. Nb6, I disagree with your analysis here. I would play Kf3 and in your line after Nb6+, then Ke4 and you have made real progress. Opening the center just gives black an isolated pawn, something for you to work on. The pawn on c5 gets a little weaker as well.
If the knights come off, it looks very drawish even though your bishop is better.
you set up for huge exchanges,try not to do that unless you want a draw
3 ... c6 (& eventual ... d5), is it KID, Grunfeld, or something else?
by Karpark a few minutes ago
Why not win with Kinght + Bishop?
by nigelnorris a few minutes ago
8/29/2016 - Outstretched
by omabad a few minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by superpatzer247 3 minutes ago
by SuirenBoid 6 minutes ago
What do you say when people ask how good at chess you are ?
by tal1961 13 minutes ago
Popular song lyrics 🎶 that best describes chess moments 💥
by AussieRookie 16 minutes ago
by Beaverboy19 17 minutes ago
Chess.com Mobile vs Chess.com Desktop
by iswarprasaddeuri 19 minutes ago
by superpatzer247 25 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!