How could've I (White) continued this attack?

Cosmicaly_Religious

Crazy blitz I played, I thought my opponent was making a mistake as he allowed me to close up the position and prowl with my kingside pawns, but the computer was insisting that I was at a disadvantage even during my offense. Somehow I ended up losing on time because I made a couple of blunders by the near end.

 

Unless, there was never a solid attack at first place?

 

EDIT: 31) Ng5 can be replied with Rf4 to blockade my rook on f1.

3141516
You made a blunder in the 32th move. Rf8 would be mate in two
Cosmicaly_Religious
3141516 wrote:
You made a blunder in the 32th move. Rf8 would be mate in two

LOL! I can't believe I missed such an obvious move.

 

Good catch, how did I not see that even in my analysis?

3141516

You did have an exciting attack, though.

KrishanaP

well your attack is good but the thing is that it has nothing substantial meaning it can be stopped if black played defensively at any point if the black feels it is getting too much