17566 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I played a rapid game (20 min + 2 sec/move) I had an advantage but it ended with a draw but I think i could have won. Please help me to analyze the game.
Please help. Critic is welcome!
i feel like you could have won the d pawn if you played Nc2 on turn 28 which would have forced them to push their pawn up to save it and then you just swing your knight back to b4 and as they have to push forward again to keep the pawn alive youjust activate your king to attak the pawn
It seems you have already found some clear improvements like 23. Re7 and 30. Rd2.
One thing I'd like to point out that 32. Rxf6? seems like a terrible mistake trading your perfectly good b-pawn for black's halfdead f6 while also giving black a dangerous passer on the a-file. After a better move than 34... b5? (Rd2+, a5 come to mind) black might well try to win. Instead of Rxf6 I'd suggest 32. Rd3 with a probable draw.
49) Rxg6? I think it is still a draw though, this just forces some play to get there, allowing black to goof it up or think away his time. Of course, white could also fumble it or run out of time. Its not a winner, its a game extender.
I think you nailed it. Rd7, preventing (or making pointless) his Rb2 would have given you a far better game.
Thank you for the analysis:-)
Too exchangey when it doesn't matter and not aggressive when it mattered.
isolated pawns are generally liability in endgames. instead of capturing the d-pawn with your rook u could hv tried playing Rd2. Then bring your king up to put pressure on either d-pawn or the h-pawn. it ll be complex to do it right but if black makes a slight mistake(which is entirely possible in such complex scenario) u ll hv an easy win.
or try something like this, objective being his reduced mobility.
by kaynight a few minutes ago
Nakamura is Japanese not American
by lofina_eidel_ismail 3 minutes ago
Sub 1000 (ranging from just below 1000 to about 400 :O)
by With_every_step 4 minutes ago
Why do you need to say draw in the middle of a game
by kaynight 4 minutes ago
10/25/2016 - Too Far Advanced
by AbhiTheGr8 5 minutes ago
The notion that <1000 is awful?
by AIM-AceMove 5 minutes ago
Why are so many non members on this site?
by aidan0816 19 minutes ago
To the people who won't stop complaining about other people
by kaynight 22 minutes ago
Time loss for f2p players punishes many other players
by ponz111 35 minutes ago
Is 1....e6 a good and flexible move against 1.d4?
by EdwinAugustus 38 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!