14558 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I check this , it was unrated game and live 3 min and if you win by coincidence again pls don't post it because it doesn't make you better the only thing that make you better is to develop your rating
well. thanks for your advice. i am just asking people for their views about my game. whether there was a better move or did i miss a tactic.
besides asking other people to go over your game and their views about your moves is very good way for developing your rating.
Admit it, you are just showcasing your win. Nothing else. Why would you give us a blitz game to analyze when you have played almost a hundred games on the site with standard time controls.
Or is this some kind of trap!? Cause Russian GM & 3 times World Champion, Mikhail Botvinnik once said "He Who analyses blitz is stupid". So is this make fools out of us?
If so,i can tell you, you succeeded a bit.
well, it is my wish whether i want to give a blitz game or a standard game for analysing . similarly , it is other people's wish to analyse my game or not.
besides i have already written why i have posted this game here. so , i am not going to waste my time arguing with you on this topic.
however,regarding analysis of blitz game, i don't have indepth understanding of chess to comment whether it was right or wrong.but still,if you press me too much to tell my view about the game then here it is :
if you just going through the game to find a tactical pattern,then it is good IMHO.
this is what i am asking from the users........ whether there is any tactical pattern which they know and is present in this game.
by the way ,that quote about blitz game was by Rashid Nezhmetdinov , not by Mikhail Botvinnik.
You said - "well, it is my wish whether i want to give a blitz game or a standard game for analysing . similarly , it is other people's wish to analyse my game or not."
That doesn't prove much. You were looking to learn from others, and to that I asked why you would post a blitz (3) game. That being said, if you're looking to better through game analysis i advice you analyse standard games. Next, going through a game just to find tactical pattern isn't what you call analysis.
Then again, these tactics won't prove that you had better chances as long as you don't have a perfect plan & given the game time I could promise you that you could never make one.
And about the quote. Uh my bad, I believe i posted it right, earlier on your friend Facebook's forum.
i guess we both are misunderstanding each other's view.
the first point : you wrote --- " Next, going through a game just to find tactical pattern isn't what you call analysis."
i never asked people to analyse this game. in my OP, i just asked them for suggestions about the game which i got such as i should forced him to play e6 then i should have pushed my passed pawn.
second point: you said -"these tactics won't prove that you had better chances as long as you don't have a perfect plan & given the game time I could promise you that you could never make one."
that might be true that i didn't had a perfect plan however implying that i could not have formed a plan is wrong as i did made a plan and ...that was pushing my passed pawn.
third point:in your earlier post,you wrote-- "Why would you give us a blitz game to analyze when you have played almost a hundred games on the site with standard time controls."
to this i answered that it is my wish to post either blitz game or standard game to analyse.however i didn't meant this game to be analysed but if it is analysed and posted here then thank you so much to that person.
fourth point:you wrote--"That being said, if you're looking to better through game analysis i advice you analyse standard games"
i was unaware of the fact that if you want to improve then you should post your standard games , not blitz game.
so , thank you so much for that advice . next time, i will try to post a standard game and ask for people to analyse it and help me improve
You can make a plan, but it would not be as brilliant as it would be if it was made with more time & thinking. And regarding posting, its your wish but you haven't posted a single standard game here, have you? My point was that you want to get more praises & recognition by posting such a game rather than analysis. Plus, now you've said that you didn't mean to have this game analysed, then why did you post it here, in the Game Analysis thread?
For what you have said last, i detect some sarcasm there.But it was a flop as i've never said anything about bettering through posting.
you wrote--- "You can make a plan, but it would not be as brilliant as it would be if it was made with more time & thinking"
first you implied that i cannot make a plan given the game time(in the post number-23) now you are saying that i can make a plan. what is this ??? trying to change your point or you are accepting that you were wrong.
you wrote-- " And regarding posting, its your wish but you haven't posted a single standard game here, have you?"
as far as i know i have posted one of my standard games. here is that link :
you wrote-- "My point was that you want to get more praises & recognition by posting such a game rather than analysis. Plus, now you've said that you didn't mean to have this game analysed, then why did you post it here, in the Game Analysis thread?"
there is one simple point which i am trying to say: i posted this game so that others can tell me about their suggestion regarding the game and whether i missed a tactic and i guess you understand the difference between analysis and what i am asking .as you have earlier wrote in the post number-23--"Next, going through a game just to find tactical pattern isn't what you call analysis". i have posted this game not to get praises from other members of this site.
i posted this game here because i felt that my request regarding the game would be much more suited for the forum game analysis rather than game showcase.
you wrote-"For what you have said last, i detect some sarcasm there.But it was a flop as i've never said anything about bettering through posting."
you are right that you have never said about posting .actually, from your advice , i got this idea that i should post standard games for analysing.
so i said thanks. besides, i was not making any sarcastic comment while thanking you.
the title shows that it is a game showcase, but please, to stop confusing us, put it in the game SHOWCASE forum
thank you so much for that meme. but actually it suits more on you. as you didn't presented any strong arguement to prove that i am wrong and you are right. you are just trying you to impose your opinion on me that i am trying to show-off.
well, i used this title to draw the attention of the users so that some of them can tell me whether i have missed tactical pattern or not. besides i have already mentioned about this before.
if Fischer played in 75, could Kasparov have defeated him in 1984?
by bunicula a few minutes ago
Images You Won't Find on the Web -untill now
by recklass a few minutes ago
Is Fabiano Caruana the only player that is stronger than Magnus
10/23/2016 - One And Done
by Sun4Ray 6 minutes ago
Questions about Chess Rules
by Bookmarke 10 minutes ago
Message to Chess.com Staff
by david 14 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by Barefoot_Player 15 minutes ago
Computers & Chess
by premio53 19 minutes ago
Thoughts on people who illegally download chess books?
by bunicula 24 minutes ago
by Newba 25 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!