21604 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
As promised. I had to do some searching to find this. It was a very good game! I realized I should've sac'ed my knight to take out his Bishop, but I was already in a horrible postion. Very good game! I would like to know if you would want another in the same opening?
Yes, we can play From's gambit again. I want to understand it better.
Frankly, I am not sure whether or not it gives equality for Black.
But given the analysis i found on some databases, i also believe that the variants with Nf6 are better than those with g5.
Schlecter, that is the consensus of many players, but I still think Lasker's Variation has more sting than he gives it credit for. I think even deep into the middlegame, if White is not careful, Black can pull him into a line. But yes, ...Nf6 is the way to go. If this tells you anything, I am a Bird's Opening player and I almost always play 1...e5 against it. I think it is a very challenging reply.
I accept and sent a request
You asked me,too, but did not send me a request.
I did, but u only accept challenges from ppl with ratings greater then 2000, that's why
funny, I challenged you, and it was not possible either, .
I will now change the settings.
ok, thank you
Cute! Not going to analyze, but I do want to ask why you always take back with the c-pawn instead of the e-pawn? This would be in reference to move 11.
just like to keep the ceter closed off and more of a mess for my opponent
here you go, I took with e and not c pawn... hope u like
Very nice! I like your interpretation on the e-pawn vs the c-pawn. Tim Taylor is the one who recommended taking back with the e-pawn in most instances, and I understand that. You are getting rid of your backward e-pawn.
Taking with the e-pawn instead of c-pawn (after c5xd4) is almost always better mainly because you open the diagonal c1-h6 for your bishop.
The plan of White in the Stonewall is a kings attack, which involves an active use of the f-pawn. That pawn is either going to f5 (which opens up the diagonal c1-h6), or waits on f4 to support an g2-g4-g5.
In both cases, Black might try to have counterplay with e6-e5.
If you have taken with the e-pawn, you can control the e-file with Qe1, or with a rook on e1, which would hinder such Black counterplay.
If Black does NOT take on d4 with his e-pawn, then the white bishop c1 needs some time until he can breath fresh air (sometimes he does a clumsy maneuvre Bc1-d2-e1-h4, in other cases he will be just a protector of the situtation in the center, with b2-b3 and Bb2).
For these reasons, c5xd4 might just accelerate the white attack on the kingside, and would then be called a positional mistake.
Another active move in a Stonewall structure (c3-d4-e3-f4 vs. c5-d5-e7-f7) is the advance c5-c4.
Such advance is often a mistake as well, because it releases tension in the center: The white pawn d4 is no longer attacked, so that White can calmly prepare e3-e4, with Nb1-d2. After an e3-e4, e4-e5 is a threat, and if d5xe4, Nxe4, the white superiority on the kingside is also obvious.
At any rate, here's the game between me and Veteranmate which was cut short....
for cutting the game short. It could've went either way. I was busy getting things for school ready. Now I'm full-time school and still working my job. It's taking a lot of my time away from everything
Millionaire Chess 2!!
by mdinnerspace 3 minutes ago
Can Somebody Tell Me The Plan Behind This?
by Pikay 12 minutes ago
2/11/2016 - Casas-Piazzini, Buenos Aires 1952
by VictorHCDM 16 minutes ago
Proof White Trumps Black
by Bakup 19 minutes ago
Renewal of Membership Farce
by RonaldJosephCote 23 minutes ago
bye in .pgn
by JPWagner 25 minutes ago
Illegal Move !!
by CamelsOfYaQub 27 minutes ago
by Martin_Stahl 29 minutes ago
Puzzles to post
by Martin_Stahl 32 minutes ago
The most interesting game of chess was played here in chess.com !!!!
by MarcoBR444 36 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!