Just have a look at this stone wall masterpiece of mine! Comments?
Stone wall attack at its best. I am white!
Sort:
You need to learn the difference between a well played game, and your opponent letting you win.
What was 11. Nxg6?
Doesn't it just lose a piece? Also what happens if he doesn't play f6? Best case your opponent sacrifices the knight back and you don't have an attack.
Sorry guys...I thought I played well this time...I will definitely improve....
Ackshat wrote:
Sorry guys...I thought I played well this time...I will definitely improve....
If youre serious about improving then start with your lack of self esteem, and hiding behind all of your posts bragging about yourself, and your chess abilities.
Yes,sometimes returning the material won is a a necessity to save the game which your opponent
failed to do..
One of the first attacks I learned as beginner.
of course I agree with above comments, that 11 Nxg6 was a big mistake. however you did know how to pounce after 15....f6 to get a dominating position.
Yes. I do have a comment. Please stop posting threads and bragging in them about how good you are if your opponent made a stupid mistake.
hahahahahha.....
Just looking at the game.
1. Nxg6 shouldn't work as a sacrifice. I would prefer to capture with the f-pawn though. Open the file for the rook and keep the diagonal b1-h7 better protected given your bishop is on it and mine is stuck
2. f6 by black is clearly awful, of course.
3. Black hasn't played this that well. When my opponent makes any kind of Maroczy bind I want a knight on the exposed square. So here I want a knight on e4 and he hasn't put one there, nor can any of the knights get there.
