13667 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Have you tried chess.com analysis? Also are you white or are you black?!
I think the point the posters above are trying to make is, if you develop the king side first and castle, you should run into less problems, as attacking a castled position is much harder than when your king is in the center. Good luck
Although time consuming, yes. You should be looking for better moves for both yourself and your opponent.
I found the best way to improve was to fully annotate the game with alterative lines, blundercheck the game and the lines with an engine and then redraft the annotations. Unfortunitly I no longer have the time to do this, and never had the time to do this with every game I played, so my own play has stagnated and atrophied.
I guess with this game you should be questioning your compensation with best play.
Awesome, I didn't really expect anyone else to do this for me. I just wasn't really quite sure what a comprehensive game analysis contained. To someone new to the game, analysis is just a word. You can't look for something if you don't know what to look for - although I understand how it might look like a silly question. Thanks for your help, I'll give it a go.
Try this course if you have access for it: http://www.chess.com/chessmentor/view_course?id=444 I think it will benefit you a lot.
Seems you got yourself into trouble in the opening. A few things I noticed. It's much more sound to finachetto the light squared bishop and try to control d5. It would have been especially useful in this game since black played an early e5 permanently weakening d5.
Your king got stuck in the center. You probably should have just taken on d5 instead of allowing d4. On top of that you put your knight on f3 which blocked the advance of your f pawn. Between those 2 things your position became extremely cramped and tough to play.
I think after you played nf3 and Ng3 black already has a crushing position.
chess.com bill of rights
by Senior-Lazarus_Long a few minutes ago
Problems defending vs 6. Ng5 in the Ruy Lopez
by chesskingdreamer 10 minutes ago
Does most of the world really love the stalemate factor?
by AussieRookie 11 minutes ago
How do i switch to new chess.com
by tomxypdq 14 minutes ago
What do you play against 1.e4?
by happyface79 18 minutes ago
The most amazing game by Vishy I've ever seen!
by Salem-Saberhagen 18 minutes ago
8/26/2016 - Kouatly - Tsheshkovsky, Hoogovens 1988
by BryanCFB 28 minutes ago
Sheesham wood grain pattern
by CrimsonKnight7 31 minutes ago
by super-bird 32 minutes ago
Looking for ideas on what to add to our chess clock
by Eyechess 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!