24656 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I recently played the following game (blitz, admittedly, but time wasn't a factor). I developed a strong attack but it petered out, and I'm trying to find where I could have forced the win (if indeed I could have). I'm going to gloss over the opening and start in the position where I launch my ultimately fruitless attack.
I did limp on a piece down for 13 more moves before time got the better of me and I tossed my queen as well. My question is, did I have a better way of pressing the attack to victory than the path I took (or the sidelines I briefly analysed), or should I have just taken the advantage I had the option to get and played out the superior endgame?
6. Rxf6 and you'll be up a piece soon after that move.
In move six i might have done Nxc7 forking your opponents rooks. take the e6 rook endagering your opponents queen and have a discovered check.( meaning you move you knight your opponent is in check and your knight can hit a weak spot a rook in two move maybe) and the game is yours. With the move you made you only succede in giving away your knight.
Actually, after 6. Rxf6 and probably 7. Nxd5, you have a potential for mate with a possible 8. Ne7+
sunshiny is right...u did some good analysis. But, also 11.r-e7 winning queen for rook
6. Rxf6 was the clear winner, exploiting the pinned knight on d5.
I didn't look at other's responses but 11. Re7+ is a crusher.
Thanks guys. Can't believe I missed 11.Re7 (both in-game and in my analysis) but Rxf6 is really, REALLY obvious now, must just have passed over the fact that the rook was defended twice forgetting that one of the defenders was the pinned knight. I was pleased with the overall attack but just couldn't quite finish it - its a learning curve, I guess!
"Hack Attack! with IM Thomas Rendle and John Sargent"
chess news is annoying
by BronsteinPawn a few minutes ago
New methods of reducing number of draws in chess (an article)
by Ziggy_Zugzwang a few minutes ago
by Whip_Kitten 4 minutes ago
by Rubylou01 6 minutes ago
Improving at King and pawn(s) endings
by exnos 8 minutes ago
95th Kumbaya Chess Tournament, Round 1
by jphillips 10 minutes ago
Old interface please.
by pgfaller 12 minutes ago
by BlargDragon 12 minutes ago
Super Grand Master vs Cocky 1700 Player
by Lasker1900 17 minutes ago
Thoughts on people who illegally download chess books?
by Esteban_Garcia 31 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!