Aggressive sparked game #2

chessmaster102

This was a game played between to members of my club who met in real rated tournament play for the first time. White was the top seed and playing black was a club memeber who was 100 or so lower rated than white. The ONLY reason this ended in a draw was because of time otherwise black would have won with ease.



Davidjordan

wow which spectator were you chessmaster and did you play in the tournament cause the game your showing is the game I played I'm the white player and OMG  that knight fork at the end would have destroyed me.Frown

CassidyT
[COMMENT DELETED]
edrobin58

The game  has all the factors a attacker would look for in a game.Smile

chessmaster102

I think both played atleast 2000 stregth.

pfren

Is this chess? After a move as simple as 9.0-0 Black can resign.

9...a6 is just ridiculous. White again has 10.0-0 and it's ciao bambino.

Is castling before move ten forbidden at your club?

chessmaster102
pfren wrote:

Is this chess? After a move as simple as 9.0-0 Black can resign.

9...a6 is just ridiculous. White again has 10.0-0 and it's ciao bambino.

Is castling before move ten forbidden at your club?

lol no thanks for spotting that out I agree white would have been better.

pfren
chessmaster102 wrote:

lol no thanks for spotting that out I agree white would have been better.

But then this is no 2000+ strength but rather nine below zero.

Davidjordan
pfren wrote:
chessmaster102 wrote:

lol no thanks for spotting that out I agree white would have been better.

But then this is no 2000+ strength but rather nine below zero.


was that statement really nesscarry or are you jokingUndecided

pfren

No, I am not joking. What's a joke is this game: full of major blunders from both sides.If it is a bullet game, then it is OK (since bullet isn't chess). Under any other time limit, it is a joke.

If you care, I can mention two handfuls of them, but 'm afraid it won't help much since you have spotted just one mistake you've done, and not that virtually every second move you played overlooked something fat.

Davidjordan

Well other than the last mistake what else did I miss.Undecided

finalunpurez

title is misleading.

chessmaster102
finalunpurez wrote:

title is misleading.

how ?

finalunpurez
chessmaster102 wrote:
finalunpurez wrote:

title is misleading.

how ?

The game is not aggresive even though it arises from a gambit line. There is also not much of an attack.

chessmaster102

whats considered a good attack to you then ?

jerry2468

The slow building of well-positioned pieces , and then the forced opening of lines. The use of tactical opportunities i.e. pins, skewer to add the the attack. Forced loss of material. Simplification and winning. Cool