beat Beth (17). Am i playing at the strength of an International Master?

Omega_Doom

baddogno

What do you think?

 
 INTENSE  One player managed to earn the win.
 
92.7
Accuracy
1-0
85.3
Accuracy
0
Brilliant
0
31
Best Move
25
5
Excellent
4
6
Good
6
6
Book
5
3
Inaccuracy
1
1
Mistake
4
0
Blunder
2
2
Missed Win
0
Omega_Doom

I have no idea. I don't know any opening and play them like crap.  When she played french and i played 9 bf4 I thought i would be crushed. It is my first game against Beth 17. Before i beat Beth 15 easily.

baddogno

All the bots that I've played seemed overrated to me.  Beating them is certainly satisfying, but I'd be careful about thinking it means much.  You kind of answered your own question though "I don't know any opening and play them like crap".  That's not IM strength...

Omega_Doom

So why is it 2400 and has a description of being IM? To make crap players feel better? I remember i played 2100 rated engine here long time ago and it felt much stronger. Basically crushed me all the time in the opening.

wizardoffire

u played well

nadipepi

Im a 1200 and I haven't even beaten age 10 yet so

Laskersnephew

NO!

R0swill

Not really beth bots are extremely overrated. Im sure chess.com did put them at that level to make new people at game feel better when they beat them, is that simple.

autobunny

beat Beth (17). Am i playing at the strength of an International Master?

Omega_Doom wrote:

 

Of course.  No other way that one can beat Beth bot in 1 game. Don't listen to the other haters. They're just trying to beat reality into you. 

autobunny
Laskersnephew wrote:

NO!

Party pooper

Omega_Doom

Classic chess.com. Hyping again.

GM_chess_player
Epiloque wrote:

beth harmon bots are crap.

I beat all of them. for the last 2 I had to resort to bullet flagging, but the rest were easy to beat. Lower their strengths by 600 points to see how strong they actually are.

how do you play them at bullet?