Excellent job! It wont be long now before you start beating GM's in standard
Bullet Win vs. a GM--27 moves!
Sort:
jengaias wrote:
Sure, beating a GM in bullet is exactly the same with beating him in any time limit.
Keep playing non thinking/monkey chess and I doubt you wil be able to beat even a b-class player in thinking chess.
I have seen Sutovsky losing from a nobody in monkey chess.The same player asked for second game but Sutovsky asked for longer time control.The guy confident from his win on bullet accepted and lost in 19 moves.He wanted a rematch and lost in 22 moves while his position was desperate already from move 15.He asked for one more and he "lost connection" while his position was more than desperate already on move 12.
I am sure he still celebrates his win against Sutovsky.He just doesn't understand that he didn't beat him in chess but in a game that uses chess rules but takes away the basic ingredient:Thinking.
It's like Lingerie Football League.It's an idiot anyone who thinks that it's football.
Bullet/monkey chess would be really fun if women with lingerie played it.Football has Lingerie League , why not chess?
Robert is not at all like that. He is rated over 2100 OTB, continues to rapidly improve, and knows how to think in slow games. He teaches me, and understands slow chess much better than me, even though I am a slow player (I repeatedly ban myself from blitz, and never play bullet). Don't be so quick to judge. He plays bullet for fun.
jengaias wrote:
Sure, beating a GM in bullet is exactly the same with beating him in any time limit.
Keep playing non thinking/monkey chess and I doubt you wil be able to beat even a b-class player in thinking chess.
I have seen Sutovsky losing from a nobody in monkey chess.The same player asked for second game but Sutovsky asked for longer time control.The guy confident from his win on bullet accepted and lost in 19 moves.He wanted a rematch and lost in 22 moves while his position was desperate already from move 15.He asked for one more and he "lost connection" while his position was more than desperate already on move 12.
I am sure he still celebrates his win against Sutovsky.He just doesn't understand that he didn't beat him in chess but in a game that uses chess rules but takes away the basic ingredient:Thinking.
It's like Lingerie Football League.It's an idiot anyone who thinks that it's football.
Bullet/monkey chess would be really fun if women with lingerie played it.Football has Lingerie League , why not chess?
I never said they were the same. Perhaps I should have been more specific? The emphasis was on YOU as in him. Because he is very good and has already defeated a WGM, an FM and probably more I don't know in standard tournament time controls.
Feb 3, 2016
0
#5
jengaias wrote:
Sure, beating a GM in bullet is exactly the same with beating him in any time limit.
Keep playing non thinking/monkey chess and I doubt you wil be able to beat even a b-class player in thinking chess.
I have seen Sutovsky losing from a nobody in monkey chess.The same player asked for second game but Sutovsky asked for longer time control.The guy confident from his win on bullet accepted and lost in 19 moves.He wanted a rematch and lost in 22 moves while his position was desperate already from move 15.He asked for one more and he "lost connection" while his position was more than desperate already on move 12.
I am sure he still celebrates his win against Sutovsky.He just doesn't understand that he didn't beat him in chess but in a game that uses chess rules but takes away the basic ingredient:Thinking.
It's like Lingerie Football League.It's an idiot anyone who thinks that it's football.
Bullet/monkey chess would be really fun if women with lingerie played it.Football has Lingerie League , why not chess?
Ho ho. I've drawn WGM's in 2 hour time controls--which is surely more than anything you have achieved.
A GM is a GM in any time control, even if he is weaker in bullet.
nice game Robert! too bad there always has to be that one person that has to rain on the parade, but, then again, why would someone do such a thing?????? oh yeah........jealousy!!! thanks for posting this game, good luck, and thanks for sharing.....greatly appreciated!
Feb 3, 2016
0
#11
Low rated players are jealous , always. New accounts talk too much. Winning vs a GM requires chess skills. Nice win.
Don't forget. Never forget.
https://www.chess.com/blog/Robert0905/nomorebullet
- Robert_New_Alekhine
- | Nov 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM
- | Posted in: Robert_New_Alekhine's Chess Addiction
- | 966 reads
- | 51 comments
Officially, no more bullet chess. At least for 10 years.
If I play one game, someone please refer me to this blog post.
I. Officially. Am. Stopping. Bullet. Chess.
That's a promise.
wow great achievement..............i would like to see the three games you lost in regular play they must be GREAT.................................................Please be relevant, helpful & nice!
Feb 3, 2016
0
#16
jengaias wrote:
AIM-AceMove wrote:
Low rated players are jealous , always. New accounts talk too much. Winning vs a GM requires chess skills. Nice win.
The funny thing with you monkey chess guys is that you even think that people envy you.Yes winning in bullet chess needs skills the problem is that you need more skills and more thinking to win in backgammon or Monopoly Junior.
I envy a good player.Or someone that played a good game and saw a combination I would never see.I would never envy a monkey chess player even if he beat Magnus Carlsen.Monkey chess is chess that needs NO THINKING.Do you get that?NO THINKING.A card game my grandma plays(7 bridge) needs quite some thinking.That means my grandma needs more skill to win a card game than you need to win a monkey chess game.
WOW!!!And I don't envy this?????I must be crazy.I humbly apologise.Must be my medicine.Didn't check the expiration dates.
You need to be a quick thinker and fast with the mouse.
Feb 3, 2016
0
#17
DonRR wrote:
wow great achievement..............i would like to see the three games you lost in regular play they must be GREAT.................................................Please be relevant, helpful & nice!
I'm 2100 OTB. Case closed.
Feb 3, 2016
0
#18
jengaias wrote:
Robert_New_Alekhine wrote:
DonRR wrote:
wow great achievement..............i would like to see the three games you lost in regular play they must be GREAT.................................................Please be relevant, helpful & nice!
I'm 2100 OTB. Case closed.
Yes fool , and if you weren't losing your time with monkey chess you could be better.
No trolls allowed on my thread. Blocking in ...5, ...4, ...3, ...2, ...1........and!!!
Feb 3, 2016
0
#19
jengaias wrote:
Robert_New_Alekhine wrote:
jengaias wrote:
AIM-AceMove wrote:
Low rated players are jealous , always. New accounts talk too much. Winning vs a GM requires chess skills. Nice win.
The funny thing with you monkey chess guys is that you even think that people envy you.Yes winning in bullet chess needs skills the problem is that you need more skills and more thinking to win in backgammon or Monopoly Junior.
I envy a good player.Or someone that played a good game and saw a combination I would never see.I would never envy a monkey chess player even if he beat Magnus Carlsen.Monkey chess is chess that needs NO THINKING.Do you get that?NO THINKING.A card game my grandma plays(7 bridge) needs quite some thinking.That means my grandma needs more skill to win a card game than you need to win a monkey chess game.
WOW!!!And I don't envy this?????I must be crazy.I humbly apologise.Must be my medicine.Didn't check the expiration dates.
You need to be a quick thinker and fast with the mouse.
Fast with the mouse???That's a chess skill I really envy.I stand corrected. Please accept my sincere compliments.
It requires quick thinking. If I just blundered away pieces I would be as bad as you.
Nice win against a GM (in bullet, but still...). I used a pin that wasn't there...there was nothing behind the pinned piece except a threat of checkmate. If he took my bishop, he would be checkmated: