Disreputable King''s Pawn Opening: Carr Defense 2, d4

[Event "1WL 2022 OPEN12 R5 Chess Champ vs The AA tournaments Club - Board 11"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2022.05.08"]
[Round "?"]
[White "MyFishSteve"]
[Black "johnpaul799"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A40"]
[WhiteElo "746"]
[BlackElo "1298"]
[TimeControl "1/259200"]
[EndDate "2022.06.24"]
[Termination "johnpaul799 won by checkmate"]

1. d4 h6 2. e4 a6 3. c3 c6 4. Bf4 d6 5. Nh3 Nd7 6. Nd2 Qc7 7. Nc4 g6 8. e5 dxe5
9. dxe5 e6 10. Nd6+ Bxd6 11. exd6 Qd8 12. Bc4 b5 13. Bd3 Bb7 14. O-O e5 15. Re1
f6 16. Bxg6+ Kf8 17. Be3 Bc8 18. Qh5 Nb8 19. Rad1 Bd7 20. Bf7 Be8 21. f4 Qd7 22.
f5 Bxf7 23. Qh4 Qe8 24. Bc5 Nd7 25. Be3 Rc8 26. Rf1 a5 27. Rf3 c5 28. Rg3 c4 29.
Qg4 Rh7 30. Bxh6+ Nxh6 31. Qe2 Nxf5 32. Rf3 Bh5 33. Qf2 Bxf3 34. Qxf3 Ng7 35.
Ng5 Rh6 36. b4 axb4 37. Rf1 Qh5 38. g4 Qxh2# 0-1

Game Review

69.8

Accuracy

0-1 

73.7

Accuracy

0

Brilliant

0

0

Great Move

3

8

Best Move

9

11

Excellent

5

8

Good

12

2

Book

0

5

Inaccuracy

4

0

Mistake

2

4

Blunder

2

0

Missed Win

0

coach 

Giveaway — Nice comeback win!

Show Best Moves 

1. 

d4

h6

2. 

e4

a6

King's Pawn Opening: Carr Defense, 2.d4

3. 

c3

c6

4. 

Bf4

d6

5. 

Nh3

Nd7

6. 

Nd2

Qc7

7. 

Nc4

g6

8. 

e5

dxe5

9. 

dxe5

e6

10. 

Nd6+

Bxd6

11. 

exd6

Qd8

12. 

Bc4

b5

13. 

Bd3

Bb7

14. 

O-O

e5

15. 

Re1

f6

16. 

Bxg6+

Kf8

17. 

Be3

Bc8

18. 

Qh5

Nb8

19. 

Rad1

Bd7

20. 

Bf7

Be8

21. 

f4

Qd7

22. 

f5

Bxf7

23. 

Qh4

Qe8

24. 

Bc5

Nd7

25. 

Be3

Rc8

26. 

Rf1

a5

27. 

Rf3

c5

28. 

Rg3

c4

29. 

Qg4

Rh7

30. 

Bxh6+

Nxh6

31. 

Qe2

Nxf5

32. 

Rf3

Bh5

33. 

Qf2

Bxf3

34. 

Qxf3

Ng7

35. 

Ng5

Rh6

36. 

b4

axb4

37. 

Rf1

Qh5

38. 

g4

Qxh2#

Adjusted Accuracy After Retries 

73.8 

+0

https://www.chess.com/game/daily/400586877

<iframe id="9303467" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" style="width:100%;border:none;" src="//www.chess.com/emboard?id=9303467"></iframe><script>window.addEventListener("message",e=>{e['data']&&"9303467"===e['data']['id']&&document.getElementById(`${e['data']['id']}`)&&(document.getElementById(`${e['data']['id']}`).style.height=`${e['data']['frameHeight']+30}px`)});</script>

I presume that you post your games because you think people will find them interesting.  However, the way you post them requires people to go through the whole game to see if there is anything interesting. 

They really are not likely to read the entire text of the Game Review you posted.

Have you even looked at the text in your posts after you post them?  They are just a mile long string of text.  No one can make sense of them without a good deal of effort.

I have previously suggested that you might put in comments or a summary letting people know if there is something especially interesting to look at.

I know you have said you don't have the time to do that. 

Why not wait to post a game until you have something really unusual or interesting?

In the game you posted , I think the above was an interesting position.  I just downloaded the game review analysis. (Use the Share button to get the pgn with the computer analysis after you run the analysis.)

Hi! Thanks again for seeing my game and your precious comment. The reason I posted or published my games is to show my creativity or novelty in the opening of every of my game. I did not follow the opening variation of opening ( King's Pawn Opening: Carr Defence 2. d4 ) but move the way I think is desire or defense against my opponent. This is if should be given my name to me the variation I did but it takes 20 ( twenty ) games is needed to give it to you I presume. The other reason is if chess.com members learn of the variation of every opening of my games, then I've done my part or contribute to chess I dear most.

I hope I enlighten you with my reason. Another thing that I didn't comment any interesting about my game is I'm very lazy to use any chess engine or database ( I have them both ) but I think chess.com members will try to look for it themselves and that way, they will be learn more to analyze the every game chess.com members posted here in Forum Game Showcase.

Thanks again. Stay safe

3 tempi are about worth a pawn.
So giving up 2 tempi with 1...h6 and 2...a6 is not as risky as a gambit of a pawn.

Very true: it is even riskier.

In the game, Black played in perfect "anti-developing" style, and after say 17.Qb3 (notice that the dumb chess dot com analysis module doesn't even mention the move, #3) White is threatening a simple checkmate at f7 which cannot be prevented without very heavy material losses (a rook, at the very least).