Sorry, you are mistaken. That game had almost nothing to do with "opposite color Bishop play." Black made two dumb rook moves, in order to grab a pawn. This allowed white to double rooks on the 7th rank and the end was near.
Instead, 24)...Rf7 and black is only slightly worse, because of his three isolated pawns. Lots of play remained in that version of the game. White might get control of the 8th rank after 25) Rfb1..., but Black's king should be safe on h7. Black's three isolated pawns seem weak, but if he is allowed to exchange a pair of rooks, the endgame is much less dangerous, and a lot more work for white to win.
Why should I be analysing this game? Isn't that the OP's responsibility?
The OP is silent, and his post is altogether devoid of annotations.
Are you really a chess player? Only 7 CC games in a year, and nothing else?
Your online chess-life appears largely exhausted by your posts to forum threads, and your (many) picture posts for the storied "Pushwood Saga." Perhaps you play OTB all the time? Is that why your record is so thin?
And you played blitz (11 years ago) somewhere else online, but never on Chess.com? What gives?
They say that sometimes (during an attack mainly) having opponent-colored bishops is the equivalent of being a piece up, and here is a particularly stark example of that. Black does his best to equalize throughout, but in the end he doesn't quite make it, due to an odd bit of tactics.