20269 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is a game I played at my uni's chess club against a player who is about equal with me and usually would never fall for this kinda thing:
That is one sad checkmate.
if he took the pawn before rook, it would have been a different story
Yes, we had a look at that after, when we analysed it. 6. exf3 (not gxf3 Qh4#) Bd4 7. Bxh8 Bxh8 8. Nc3 leaves black with a knight and bishop, an exposed enemy king and a long diagonal, and white with a rook and two pawns, two white isolated pawns as targets and a passive position. Unclear, but I'd rather my side of the board anyday.
hmmm to me it looks liek white wouldnt be passive at all..quite the contrary...but still black would likely win any endgame so the onus would be on white to prove something.
Well in the variation I pointed out, black has 2 pieces developed, has the next move so will soon have 3, and white has only one piece developed. Looks pretty passive to me.
I tend to label positions passive when it has a more long term nature to them than development. I dont think black can prevent white from getting his pieces deployed in a very aggresive manner. certainly the game would continue with nc3...and i dont even think that knight is all that pinned because he can sac his h8 rook for the bishop and get maybe too much compensation.
Fair enough, it's just a question of semantics. I guess the other thing that makes me think it's passive is that black still has all 4 minor pieces, where white only has 2. Until that extra rook white has gets a chance to develop somewhere useful, black will be having most of the fun, in my opinion.
Wow! That was a very sad checkmate right there! Your opponent really blundered. If he took 5.gxf3 or 5.exf3 then he would have been fine from then on. 5.Bxh8?? was a huge blunder. Very greedy for material. Anyways, it was a good checkmate nontheless, and well played.
Reminds me of the good old days of Andersson and Morphy, Chigorin, etc.
Now that's a passive game (in post 15)
yeah. It didn't actually happen.
I assume you meant 6. for all those moves. 6. gxf3 would have met a just-as-immediate end with 6... Qh4#
Never saw such an early mate before with a pawn. Nice! :)
Good God, who is that patzer playing the white pieces?
Bahaha! I forgot I made this thread :) sorry that I had to make an example of your game :P
Haha, it was well worth posting, quite an odd miniature. Being mated on f2 by a pawn is outrageous. Actually I think 3...Bc5! is a nice move, sort of turns the tables on black's gambit mentality.
White put the mat in 3 moves
by AdamDoncreek a few minutes ago
Wild Chess Imagery
by Pawnghost a few minutes ago
Chess addiction. The cure (I)
by kingofshedinjas 3 minutes ago
7/25/2016 - What Must Be Done
by Aidenh32 6 minutes ago
Are conditional moves not working?
by MDJuggler 6 minutes ago
Explain this blunder
by spawkle529 8 minutes ago
chess.com +2000 tactics seems easier for me!
by AIM-AceMove 8 minutes ago
EQ is more important then IQ in chess
by ChessOfPlayer 9 minutes ago
MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION
by kingofshedinjas 11 minutes ago
Issue with Chessbase 12 and Windows 10
by chkmtk2wr 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!