5695 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
To be honest I never expected posting occasional games in the Game Showcase arena would ever be so controversial. I had posted several a while back in the General Chess Discussion thread and was criticized for not posting them here. I post some here and I'm criticized for posting no lost games. So, several days ago I posted anotated lost games here, but I guess I'll face criticism for not posting and draws or games where I lost to a blindfolded monkey. As I've stated before, I'm primarily an entertainer, really a writer, and try to simply present some short, amusing games - ones that require little deep analysis because, by their nature, weren't very deeply played. Controversy, even unworthy controversy, can be entertaining, I imagine, but mostly it's simply attention-getting (and I'm certainly not above attention-seeking) without the amusement or fun. I don't find those who have spoken on my behalf as "White Knights" or "Batgirl Fans" or anything else other than supporters of an idea (as opposed to anything personal). But while I don't begrudge anyone their opinions or their right to express them, I do have trouble seeing the big deal.
it's quite natural tendency to post wins. there is nothing to raise eyebrows. if all keep posting only wins that means our losses r posted by somebody else. nothing special i see in it.let them post wins. that means all the games r getting posted in the forums.
Since reading isn't entertaining, writers can't be entertainers. :-p
I have been on chess.com for about 1 1/2 years. In that time I have been drawn into several religious debates, political debates and debates about cheat detection. In fact the cheaters forum is basically everyone attack the last person banned. If there are no interesting new banned players then those on that forum attack each other. Yes I do not run from debates so much of the above is partially my fault being a participate in these debates but it seems everything is a big controversy on this site. It is amazing any one has time to play chess. lol. We should rename the site debate.com. So yes Batgirl you have suceeded in being an entertainer once again even though you, I and several others are shocked how it came about. Now when are you posting the blindfolded monkey game? ROFL. The games were interesting. Thanks.
There are a lot of tiny things that bother me, that most people wouldn't even notice. For example, one time I complained to a titled player that he didn't update his rating, which had dropped 40 points or so, because I thought he wanted to make himself look as good as possible by only showing the highest OTB rating he had achieved. It's probably insignificant to most people, but somehow it irritated me enough to say something about it. I understand it's not a big deal to most people, but everything is relative -- what's not a big deal to one person, could be a big deal to someone else.
I think reading can be entertaining. This whole debate which is in writing has been entertaining. Beyond this a writer can also be an entertainer when not writing.
That last one sounds like something a teenager would do. Actually, that seems to make sense, now that I think about it.
I was joking. Who reads internet forums and doesn't like reading? :-p
I don't know but I seen some people interact of the forum who seem almost incapable of reading.
Hey Elubas, I wasn't trying to insult you. You're pretty insightful, really.
Perhaps you should express yourself more clearly and concisely then.
Could you please be a little clearer and a bit more precise?
Yeah, but maybe he could be more insightful if he really tried. Hey Looby, are you holding out on us? This is the kind of thing that can really piss me off.
Btw this is one of the weirdest goofiest threads ever. I'm serious.
It's the time of year, season of goodwill and all that.
Happy Valentines day, everybody!
I thought that was in February? It's October.
10/26/2016 - What's Better Than Winning A Queen?
by Tharinda97 3 minutes ago
I feel like punching my opponent in the face after losing
by Live-The-Moment 5 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess....a review
by RussBell 5 minutes ago
Anyone else disgusted by fat chess players?
by kaynight 6 minutes ago
As piece movement here is a total fuckup (i.e. piece selection and deselection is slow and difficult
by kaynight 9 minutes ago
by pjreed86 14 minutes ago
Express if you like or do not like the new version of the site
by Party_Knight 15 minutes ago
Is 1....e6 a good and flexible move against 1.d4?
by TwoMove 19 minutes ago
by lcchess14 22 minutes ago
why i have to back to old chess.com for an analysis?
by Party_Knight 30 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!