wait a minute. After that comment you like my attitude !? ok then thanks :)
Haha, your welcome, but I was refering to the attitude of Scottrf. Nice trick to get the thread back in attention.
The only thing I said about you is that you do not have the expertise level to be a chess teacher and that I will not imply here that you are lying.
And of course that you are unmodest about your chess skills, because you pretend to be able to teach chess although you - just like me - have not reached the required understanding for teaching chess.
Yes but if you are the same, why are you saying that I am not good enough. You cant tell if you are the same level right ?
I say that because I consider myself also not good enough to teach chess. I have read comments on several games. I don't think you understand chess better. I would never say that I would start a minority attack with black for instance when both sides have still eight pawns on the field. A minority attack is an attack with less pawns against a pawn majority. You had an equal number of pawns.
Yeah I missed counted the pawns.
Was one hiding behind the clock? If you play me OTB, one will find itself placed there.
No, nobody was hiding behid the clock.
How do you miscount pawns if your opponent has not hid one of them?
I counted quickly
This is better than the comments on the daily puzzle !
haha yeah ! :)
I think that a tic in your eye caused you to miss a square or two. These tics are a common chess ailment known as Amaurosis scacchistica.
I can't even...
cant even what ?