12891 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Well i have, basicly, a couple of questions. The first one is which of the three different ratings we use in chess.com is more representative of our real fide elo rating? bullet, blitz or standart?my second question has to do with a post i read a while ago about someone who sky rocketed his elo rating to 2045 mainly by solving tactics and studying endings. so if im around 1700 standart should i focus mainly in this to aspects of my chess studying?
The simple answer to question #1 is NONE.
Live Standard (on chess.com or ICC, or FICS or ANY live chess server) tries to "suggest" a correlation to one's true OTB rating but even then, OTB players are a different species altogether. While one can argue that strong tournament-rated OTB play is indicative of strong online play at similar time controls ... the reverse is not at all true as the committment/discipline levels of a regular (plays every week) 1200-tournament player are miles ahead of a 1600-1700 online player who monkeys around with 3-min blitz (or even slower time controls) on-and-off during the day while eating a bag of chips / checking messages on their phone.
Trying to match ratings between different systems and/or rating pools is really just approximating ... but for what? I don't really see the benefit of this exercise. If you want to know how good you are at Federation rated OTB, go sign up and play one! :)
To your other question: Improving one's performance (and therefore, over a long run, their rating) is a mix of a lot of different factors. Tactics tends to be the really big slice of that pie-chart for club players ... so yes, a tactics-heavy diet of chess preparation will definitely be an efficient way of getting you closer to a rating goal. You do want to supplement that with other stuff as well ... but at the club levels, you will lose more games due to missing tactical shots than any other mistake.
8/24/2016 - Shock And Awe
by Arisktotle 4 minutes ago
Non - Chess celebrity who played chess..
by shmuly87 6 minutes ago
Is it weird to dominate like I am in my first few games?
by AussieRookie 10 minutes ago
AMAZING FREE Chess Clinic
by cheeky_chicky 12 minutes ago
by Nicholas_Shannon80 14 minutes ago
Hi, please I appreaciate that you guys tell me what is the best defense against
by SuirenBoid 15 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by Nicholas_Shannon80 20 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by Connor_Macleod1518 24 minutes ago
Which is most dominant country on chess.com?
by DeltaAquarid 26 minutes ago
tactic trainer changes
by 0110001101101000 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!