Chess.com Staff Bias is a load of Horse Fertilizer

RonPaulsSteelBalls

Aside from the constant attacks and stupid opinions of labeling Carlsen "arrogant," "coward," a new menu item was added to the Chess.com stable: Top Players and with this menu item is the most biased list of "Top Players" in all of Chess archiving. The list shows Kasper as #1, Carlsen as #7, and Hickory at #3 even.

Seriously what is with this derangement of being so envious of exceptional human beings that even Chess.com Staff must belittle human renaissance and elevate someone like Kasperoff (who is infinitely more deranged (He once said women can not play Chess before losing to a woman) than anything remotely close to what some people claim Fischer resembled).

Carlsen is the best.

Live with it and Chess.com stop your diaper-wetting, crocodile-tears, and teaching the youth the patzer players are the best and the best players are the patzers.

#1. Morphy

#2. Fischer

#3. Carlsen (probably #1 later)

Prove me wrong; you can not.

cellomaster8
Who’s Kasperoff?
RonPaulsSteelBalls
cellomaster8 wrote:
Who’s Kasperoff?

Exactly!

autobunny

Kasper on kasper off

null

Scottrf

Morphy lol

kennedyryderparis

Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think its ranked man.

IpswichMatt

The list is clearly not meant to be in order - for example, Capablanca's 26 on the list.

JayeshSinhaChess

Magnus and you should totally get a room.

52yrral

autobunny=You nailed it again!

ed1975

As Matt rightly says, they are in no particular order. But as chess.com is American run, there is a preponderance of American players towards the towards the top of the list. Otherwise the likes of Nakamura wouldn't be ahead of a whole glut of former world champions.

Acroduster

If you say gullible slowly, it’s sound like oranges. 

autobunny
JayeshSinhaChess wrote:

Magnus and you should totally get a room.

Why?  You running a motel? 

null

ArgoNavis