15649 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
For my computer scienece class I created a chess program. I have been struggling for a while to determine its rating for some reason. It is better than I am but I am not that good, and I have not had consistent results when testing it against other engines. I was wondering if anyone who is interested (and is maybe better than me at chess) would play a game against it and tell me what you estimate its rating to be? If you want you can post the game, if the game is interesting or something. Just be aware that right now it doesn't let you undo/view past moves. Also, it doesn't have en passant or draw by repitition/50 move. But other than that it's fully functional. Thanks for any time you guys spend!
Like all engines it's a funny mix of very accurate in the short term vs taking huge risks in the long term. e.g. a human is likely to screw up the mover order of a 2-3 move tactic if there's a lot going on in a blitz game but a computer wont. And a human won't pawn grab in the opening and get way behind in development but a computer will.
One game I had it all squished up with nothing to do but build my attack and poof, no en passant so it closed up the attacking lines and escaped lol.
So anyway, it's hard to say because it doesn't play like a human. A few short tactics it did miss actually. I played a few 10 and 5 minute games. I'd guess 1300-1500.
Hey thanks for your opinion. I do agree that it is very sporadic performance: ive had it solidly beat stockfish set on 1700 but then lose to it at 1400. Thanks for your time, and sorry about the no en passant.
Some people sugested to play against Chess.com Java engine, which has 3 difficulty levels. If you are taking this suggestion, please post updates.
What's wrong with people on chess.com?
by DamonevicSmithlov 4 minutes ago
CHESS INTEGALATIC -Cap. II-(Lec. 82)
by luis_albert 6 minutes ago
HUMORISTIC FUNNY CHESS PICS, IMAGES, CARICATURES, ETC...
by recklass 8 minutes ago
A game won without even one aggressive move played...
by BronsteinPawn 11 minutes ago
Is Bughouse broken?
by BronsteinPawn 12 minutes ago
10/22/2016 - Disjointed
by theREALchessmaster06 14 minutes ago
What is the best variation of the Sicilian Defense?
by jhubchess 15 minutes ago
pattern recognition，Combination, etc
by Sqod 16 minutes ago
R. RETI, un Genio Olvidado-Cap. V-Lucha entre 2 piezas Heterogenes-Est. 31
by luis_albert 21 minutes ago
How could i win this midgame?
by ArtNJ 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!