13534 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
if i get challenged, it tells me how many points i risk or gain, how do i know if i challenge someone else?
i never see how many points i can risk losing or gaining ... where do u find that out?
true. blitz for good memory and sight. plodders rely more on their analytical skills, performing poorly in blitzes. so i think....anyway.
I agree , 1200 is average, and you can rise or down, play and no ask, or you can do yourself the website.
ok then... i think the ratin is a great idea... but still dont understand it ...
I like joeyson's earlier response. His answer was don't worry about ratings just play. After all, we all hope we're playing a person at the other end not a person using a computer.
o0obruceleeo0o wrote: 1200 is supposed to be the average rating in the elo rating system, so most chess playing websites start all players at 1200.
ok then ... so u can be great player and u still start at 1200
Anand could join chess.com and he'd start out at 1200.
yeah even tho he is good ?
i need practice so someone wanna teach me?
Gideon wrote: One of my friends can only think an average of three moves aheed, but I can't seem to beet him in blitz!!
If you could calculate accurately three full moves ahead on a consistent basis you would be a very strong player.
I love the rating system.
254 losses to 150 wins and my rating is 1570. I have been playing on a consistant basis for about 8 months and by playing as many high rated players as possible I have become much better at reading the development of lines as well as a respectable increase to my rating all the while having a terrible win/loss ratio. If I continue like I am, I am sure that I will achieve a 2000 rating within two years; but only if I curb my impulsiveness at critical moments.
I am new here. I kind of understand the rating system, but how do people get points?
play the game ratings don't really matter
Opening against e4 as well d4?
by jake_allstar1 a few minutes ago
How long does it take to be a 2000 rate player?
by Vanitn1213 3 minutes ago
Fair Play Policy
by MyRatingis1523 5 minutes ago
Question on types of rapid play
by MyRatingis1523 7 minutes ago
The difference between CPUs when analyzing chess games
by MyRatingis1523 8 minutes ago
Why didn't Fischer play Karpov
by mcris 10 minutes ago
Someone challenge me
by MyRatingis1523 10 minutes ago
10/27/2016 - Backed In
by DonnieDoncaster 12 minutes ago
The Einstein-Rosen spot (II)
by pampi_nero 18 minutes ago
8/19/2007 - Better Late Than Never :)
by joshdorn2000 21 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!