Chess will never be solved, here's why

We cant exactly rule out having a perfect solution for every position and still losing by force due to opposing optimal play lol

Yes, so it's meaningless. There's no possible use for chess being "solved". Incidentally, obviously "what is solved?" is in relation to the comment preceding that question.

Why an admission? Why is it telling? The answers to this and other questions will be revealed when we perfect drivelvision. Invest in drivelvision now! You know it makes no sense.

...and a telling deflection attempt.

Where there's nothing but thin air to deflect, then no attempt need be made. Therefore it was not a deflection attempt. So why was it telling?

Then the perfect solution to that position would be a loss. A perfect solution--all the way to checkmate or any form of draw--just means we know the end result every possible continuation, and the opponent has a clear route to unavoidable victory. Any chance to change the result would lie in the moves leading to the position in question.

1. You are not friends with anyone that does hold you in higher esteem than you do them. You can't handle anyone that thinks they are a peer.

2. Player is prone to supplication when trying to achieve his dreams of being on a real team and being approved/respected by all and sundry.

Perfect fit, for now...but ultimately, doomed.

So youre agreeing with me?

Essentially. Or we could just say that said position DOES have a perfect solution leading to a forced win. For the opponent.

Sure, I was just sort trying to be snarky stating the obvious with my initial point, but yes

chess been solved it called a draw!

Exactly. It's not exactly about winning per se, it's jsut knowing all end results. Tic-Tac-Toe is a great example, because it is solved, but the perfect game always ends in a draw and can't be won unless someone makes a mistake.

Nope. Chess has not been solved, and will not be in our lifetimes.

I think it's solved but it's possible that there can never be proof one way or the other. But if the very silly "best moves from every position" form of solution is desired, that won't occur in our lifetimes. We agree on something.

I'm certainly certain I'm not friends with you.
BUT ... are you CERTAIN that you're alright? Are you sure?
I think that was from your point of view and actually a rare insight into your condition projected onto me for self-protection. But let's not go too far down there. Just maybe calm down and accept that you don't impress some people. I'm sure I don't but it isn't about me.

Thinking about what you said, it seems clear that you don't realise that the essential part of friendship is mutual respect. Not necessarily full acceptance, Dio, but respect. Of course, "friends" on this site are different. Some really are friends ... either friendships made here or real life friends members here too. But many are people we never get to know. Maybe one of us did something at some point that made the other like them or something. I get friend requests and I always accept unless there's something I don't like ... no matter that we haven't interacted. I send them out occasionally .... not very much. It's a token kind of thing.

Of course you're not friends with me. I'm not beneath you.

I don't care about impressing people or getting their approval. That's for the insecure to wade through. I can think of two sterling examples.

Meanwhile, get your own points/arguments and/or stop incorporating things posters have said about you for years into your playbook.

You have a very strange way of thinking about things that come naturally to most people. You're massively insecure. That's why all your posts are about comparing yourself with others and about your endless feuds with everyone. The rest of us don't have feuds with others all the time.

Everything you write about people comes from within you because it's about yourself. You seem to have no idea that it's so transparent and easy to see. Please get yoursef sorted out.

Don't you know what I'm talking about and do you really think you can hide it?

Anyway, enjoy yourself.

this is my first chess forum post. i think that given the new quantum technologies, chess will be able to be solved. there are 19 pieces (including empty), and 64 squares, that will make 19^64 (or +81) possibilities. assuming we need a gigabyte (8 million bits) for one chess position, we would need 273 qugigabytes, or 2 billion qubits. this is because 2^273 is bigger than 19^64. if you think that 273 qugigabytes is a lot, your hard drive probably has more space than 273 normal gigabytes.
this estimate also does not take into account like some positions (multiple kings, pawn on the back rank, 10 queens, zero kings, etc.) are impossible. so assuming we have all of this quantum space, we should be able to solve and store chess with computers.