13846 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
While it has huge benefits (not included here), it is subject to abuse, for example:
The top rated blitz player has achieved his mega rating having only played SEVEN games.
As you scroll through the list, you will find many players on the front page have only played a handful of games, and even more have played less than 100 or so.
It seems necessary, then, to introduce some measures against this, such as e.g. a provisional rating which becmes real after so many games, etc.
Mehh, you could get the highest rating in the world by playing 1000 rated players, what good does it do you?
In addition to strategies like reporting ranked lists by rating only among players who have some specified maximum RD, another approach I've advocated is to rank players not by rating, but by a quantity like rating - RD or even rating - 2*RD.
Even another idea is to rank players according to a quantity like
which turns out to be monotonically related to the probability a player's true strength is greater than 2200.
- Mark (a.k.a. glicko)
Looks like a t-value, of sorts, that (rating - 2200)/RD.
Yes, in fact it's a z-value (from a normal distribution), since a player's rating under the Glicko system is assumed to be approximately normally distributed.
I guess the staff have no issue with this :S
My Question is ...
If Im rated 1200 with this glicko,
What would my rating be in the elo system that USCF uses????
Grandmasters should play more with amateurs not themselves
by bunicula a few minutes ago
First, thank you! Then, one small suggestion.
by batgirl 3 minutes ago
Poll on V3
by 0110001101101000 3 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by bunicula 5 minutes ago
by BISHOP_e3 10 minutes ago
I PLAYED OVER 1700 GAMES IN BLITZ, YET MY RATING IS STILL AT 900.
by Alvin_Cruz 13 minutes ago
A game against a high rated player
by 0110001101101000 17 minutes ago
Positions reflected around a vertical axis
by notmtwain 21 minutes ago
by The_4th_Stonewall 24 minutes ago
mate in two #7
by Senior-Lazarus_Long 30 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!