Disgustingly Bad Players Who Only Attack

rychessmaster1

It's StrangeMover surprise.png

Caesar49bc

It's amnoying. Defensible, but your forced to defend and develop pieces at the same time. Occasionally mutually exclusive, so your left grinding your way just to the middle game. Luckily the games are usually pretty short, since it's difficult for your opponent to keep up a sustained offense while you slowly activated most of your pieces... leaving them to wonder how you crushed them with 5 or 6 pieces instead of allowing yourself to be mated with the opponents really active queen and knight.

stopsucking

me looking for where i asked: meh.png

bong711

Tournament directors must not allow wrestlers or former wrestlers join the tournament. A loss could result to extreme violent Attack.

BattleSoldier
bong711 wrote:

Lama beats Lord Hammer! 500+ against 300+ post.

Congratulations Lama!

Congrats, Llama, on the win!  Everyone was routing for you! Don't like folks who are full of themselves.

congrandolor

What happened? Was the match llama vs the annoying millenial finally played? What was the result?

BattleSoldier

Oops - I meant rooting!  

I thought Llama won because Bibi disappeared.

llamonade2
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:

I'm pretty sure Llama got snockered!

Yeah pretty much.

When I found out it wasn't the person's primary account I got drunk and made fun of the guy for a few hours then blocked him (a the two of us probably increased the post count here by a few 100 in that time span heh).

I played a few games with @1_a31-0 instead. I'm (generally) willing to play anyone (no crazies).

rychessmaster1
llamonade2 wrote:
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:

I'm pretty sure Llama got snockered!

Yeah pretty much.

When I found out it wasn't the person's primary account I got drunk and made fun of the guy for a few hours then blocked him (a the two of us probably increased the post count here by a few 100 in that time span heh).

I played a few games with @1_a31-0 instead. I'm (generally) willing to play anyone (no crazies).

Including letting me adopt you wink.png

llamonade2

Sure, lets play some games sometime. Thursday or the weekend would be good for me. Like I've said before I'm flexible on rated/unrated and time control.

My personal favorite is 3/0 and since you're higher rated I think rated favors me (losing to you 10 times would be about the same as losing 1 normal game heh, so basically I get to play you for free even if it's rated)

rychessmaster1
llamonade2 wrote:

Sure, lets play some games sometime. Thursday or the weekend would be good for me. Like I've said before I'm flexible on rated/unrated and time control.

My personal favorite is 3/0 and since you're higher rated I think rated favors me (losing to you 10 times would be about the same as losing 1 normal game heh, so basically I get to play you for free even if it's rated)

3 min is fine, though i'd rather do unrated for obvious reasons. 

Caesar49bc
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:

Or maybe "amnoying" is a truly amazing amount of annoying.

🤣

NamNam2019ishKnight

This thread was a complete waste of an hour of my life. Both of you are chickens, kizi and llama, you agreed to a game, made everyone excited, then dissapointed

btickler
NamNam2019ishKnight wrote:

This thread was a complete waste of an hour of my life. Both of you are chickens, kizi and llama, you agreed to a game, made everyone excited, then dissapointed

Actually the most notable thing about this thread to me was not the head to head animosity, it was the 5th grade schoolyard nature of all the commentary from people wanting to see a fight for entertainment.  It gives an even dimmer view of the average maturity level on the site.

IMBacon
NamNam2019ishKnight wrote:

This thread was a complete waste of an hour of my life. Both of you are chickens, kizi and llama, you agreed to a game, made everyone excited, then dissapointed

Of course it was a waste of time.  45 pages and counting.

"made everyone excited"???  Who or why would this excite anyone?

Anyone that has been here long enough, or been on the internet long enough can recognize online bravado. 

bong711
NamNam2019ishKnight wrote:

This thread was a complete waste of an hour of my life. Both of you are chickens, kizi and llama, you agreed to a game, made everyone excited, then dissapointed

They aren't chicken. They are fast runners.

bong711
bong711 wrote:
NamNam2019ishKnight wrote:

This thread was a complete waste of an hour of my life. Both of you are chickens, kizi and llama, you agreed to a game, made everyone excited, then dissapointed

They aren't chicken. They are fast runners.

 

Maybe they are better in a running contest happy.png 100 M dash or 10 km Marathon?

llamonade2

100 miles and still runnin'

 

llamonade2

btickler
llamonade2 wrote:
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:

I'm pretty sure Llama got snockered!

Yeah pretty much.

When I found out it wasn't the person's primary account I got drunk and made fun of the guy for a few hours then blocked him (a the two of us probably increased the post count here by a few 100 in that time span heh).

I played a few games with @1_a31-0 instead. I'm (generally) willing to play anyone (no crazies).

Same guy, same modus operandi (all talk and no substance, bails when cornered):

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/blocking-and-lack-of-integrity