15324 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Well, I just lost a game of blitz. I had a bishop and a couple of pawns remaining. My opponent had just a bare king. Guess what? I lost on time! Now, I am aware that it is impossible to lose on time in such a situation. Yet I'm still being bombarded with invitations to pay for an uprated membership. Does this mean that if I pay them then they will actually apply the rules of chess to my games????
post the link to the game please
http://www.chess.com/fb/livechess/game?id=450032448I had a second remaining when I took the last pawn. I took the pawn and then my time went to zero. Evidently chess.com has some sort of problem regarding timing because you can't lose a chess game on time when your opponent has no mating material and guess what? The program has kindly replaced his pawn. I am really not very impressed!
According to the final position, you didnt take the pawn. Your time must have dropped just before.
And yes, chess.com does know the rules, and they are implemented perfectly.
And your lag was probably the issue.
Since in the game I did take the pawn, there is evidently a problem and the problem is not mine.
And since I was moving instantaneously and yet the program managed to have me take something like five seconds for my last four moves, I would suggest that what you call "my" lag is not actually my lag at all but an endemic programming issue.
I've had it happen a few times. Play a move on the board, to later discover that I'm out of time. It's probably lag and I was too slow. I just suck it up and move on. What else is there?
Goodness was this game worth a million dollers for you to get this upset over? Lag is lag good sir no matter how awful it is.
It's annoying, that's all. If it is an unimportant issue then evidently it is insufficiently unimportant for you to answer. Yet you answered and you are supporting "authority" and the status quo. That's your choice.They want our money and yet they have programming issues wherein we're recorded as having lost games that we haven't lost and pawns are replaced on the board. It really is that simple!! Goodbye and thankyou for your interest!!
Insufficiently unimportant! :( Sorry!
Does chess.com know the rules of chess ? Hmmmm.....let me think. Does chess---- YES ! Did i come up w/ the right answer?
Awhile ago, they changed live chess so that even premoves take some fraction of time off your clock.
I am aware of that but I don't use premoves. I'm talking about playing a move that gives rise to checkmate and seeing it "stick", then a fraction later, the "You've lost on time" notification appears. With the board still showing checkmate.
What???????When the opponent has no mating material YOU CANNOT LOOSE on time?? Is this true? Ive lost a few games like that and thought ofcourse that i lost on time though it seemed unfair .... But in a sense if you have a queen and the opponent K+2p and you loose on time? It is still unfair in that sense...
Wow, to argue so much over flagging in a blitz game - you must be a real treat in OTB tournaments.
Wow, to argue so much over flagging in a blitz game - you must be a real treat in OTB tournaments. +1
Be faster to move and slower to whine. ivandh +1
Be faster to move and slower to whine.
Words of a genius!
How to crush the Nimzo!
by adumbrate a few minutes ago
An idiot just called me an idiot.
by SHWETA_BENIWAL a few minutes ago
Bobby Fischer Vs. Nakamura or Carlsen
by Megabyte 11 minutes ago
Chess.com's Weekly Study: May 15th 2016
by fightingbob 11 minutes ago
5/25/2016 - From Side To Side
by pajo2014 13 minutes ago
NEW CHESS.COM VS OLD CHESS.COM
by zaveric 14 minutes ago
Learning the London System.
by notmtwain 18 minutes ago
Checkmate problem of the week#1
by baddogno 31 minutes ago
by macer75 62 minutes ago
What if the starting position were centrally symmetric?
by Aravindsomaraj 62 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!