19887 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
in my case no!! i trust my instincts .if u gonna lose ,u will eventualy lose, calculating a lot dosent mean you calculate right..
yup, seeing your rating......
Yea I looked at one of his games lol. If your intiution is already bad, which it clearly is, then how do you expect to get better?
guys show mercy plss. i am playing chess after a gap of 30 + yrs , last played in school, already confessed am an amatuer.Encouraging comments from seniors will definitely help me learn more and improve.
Then follow the advice given instead of disagreeing with it.
Guys, no chess integrism please : everybody is entitled free thought process...
I don't always calculate, but when I do...
I prefer Texas Instruments.
Stay nerdy my friends...
Oh my god so much awesome.
Haha, I like it.
Replace Texas Instruments with "reverse polish notation" for that extra nerdy flair
Like I said, I don't have the incentive to actually expend energy on online games. Afterall, all I get for winning is fake rating points.Also i've got too many distractions here.
Read this post carefully. Read it again. hell....read it again.
Does it sound strange to you? ....it does to me.
why is that?
It's much simpler than that. If God wants you to win, you win. If God wants you to lose, you lose. Why complicate it?
God is watching our games neutrally like an arbiter.
yes, good old loving god, Should read, "God is watching the war in syria neutrally, like an arbiter." ...? seems like he? couldn't care less? last i heard he was in Istanbul somewhere smokin' some hash, and getting laid.
Now there's a god I can believe in.
There's a god I could get behind.
What was the topic? Oh yes, calculating. . . at my level, if i take more than 15 minutes, is that too long normally? Does that mean I should do more tactics?
If you're playing a 20 minute game, yes, it's too long.
Yes obviously if its a 20 minute game its too long. In a long game, i.e 90/60 or longer, 20 minutes isnt too long but you have to pick and choose when you take time. You should not be taking 20 minutes to make what is an obvious move like recapturing a piece, or in the opening where you have 3 candidate moves and they are all reasonable. You should be taking time when you have a position that requires you to calculate multiple variations because if you move quickly in a position like this you can easily miss a threat.
Chess.com worst website on the internet
by Connor_Macleod1518 2 minutes ago
8/26/2016 - Kouatly - Tsheshkovsky, Hoogovens 1988
by Kotteb 3 minutes ago
e4 c5 bc4?
by Uhohspaghettio1 4 minutes ago
Chess legends. Where would be Carlson's position in a list?
by badenwurtca 4 minutes ago
What do you say when people ask how good at chess you are ?
by OmgItsLiz 4 minutes ago
Does most of the world really love the stalemate factor?
by evertVB 4 minutes ago
I hate openings
by AIM-AceMove 5 minutes ago
by Destroyer_Mark_1420 6 minutes ago
Chessbazaar Reykjavik Championship set in Sheesham, 3.8" king
by jinnymer 7 minutes ago
Looking for ideas on what to add to our chess clock
by Bawker 8 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!