22792 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
It seems most who can speak intelligently about them are 1700<, which is higher than my rating.
"Would you please point out which piece you moved? My mind was on the serious developments occuring on the Korean Peninsula."
I would have forked your King and Queen if it wasn't for that nuclear test.
Following some top level games and what the GMs are doing should have some good effect on your game.
I would have assumed he spoke about events like the Candidates tournament in London. :o
Ah... OK. Well, I stand corrected.
Following the games from International Tournaments could be helpful if you understand them. Not sure how helpful it would be if they only confused you, though.
I play less chess than I used to, but I follow tournaments and play through games. I haven't seen a decline in my playing. I also can't say that I've improved. Perhaps like blueemu said, that if I can understand the games I watch more than I do, then I would probably improve. There are moments though, where I understand the lines of play and the purpose of moves played. What I don't grasp is a deeper level that I'm not seeing yet. I'm missing something about chess that's right beneath the surface. It's intiguing. There is a mystery I still have to solve.
Really sorry about that, I should have clarified. And yes I suppose that's true, they could probably improve your tactical vision if you understood them, but do you or do you not? That is the question I should be asking myself. And I'm not sure I can understand 100% of the moves being played, at least not on the "deeper level" that trysts mentioned. But I suppose they're always worth watching as there always is the possibility that you will improve in watching them. Not sure.
how come this guy is 2000 blitz but 1200 tactics
by TRextastic 2 minutes ago
3 ... c6 (& eventual ... d5), is it KID, Grunfeld, or something else?
by zeitnotakrobat 4 minutes ago
8/29/2016 - Outstretched
by sighbeerguy 6 minutes ago
by estenssoro 6 minutes ago
by Rob3rtJamesFischer 6 minutes ago
Some players ruin the sport of chess
by thegreat_patzer 7 minutes ago
2826-4000 Worst Things To Do While Playing Chess
by ChessPlayinDude47 7 minutes ago
Are GMs stupid?
by Rob3rtJamesFischer 8 minutes ago
The Best Games
by gchess33 8 minutes ago
The notion that <1000 is awful?
by AIM-AceMove 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!