Forums

Dutch idiot goes beserk

Sort:
FunWithChess20

@learningthemoves

See post #10 Laughing

 

@Dischyzer.

You are not alone, my brother had the same problem.

 

@wiebelenstra

Offcourse I agree that listening to the jokes of linuxblu1 and AndyClifton is always to harsh.

But the fact that the police states that the attacker had a "mild mental handicap" should not immediatly excuse him from a "normal" disciplinary action. If so, all normal disciplinary actions for violance can be thrown away. Whoever performs such an action will (at least at that very moment) not be thinking clear. 

Dischyzer

@FunWithChess   . . .and if anyone is thinking clear (or thinking they are) when they perform an act of violence, then they are most likely a sociopath, lacking a moral conscience. I agree that when some one acts out they are not thinking well. The judicial system is full of people that have mental issues. They still need to be held responsible. What justice is there for the victim if not?

honinbo_shusaku

Potential athelete for chess boxing?

gaereagdag

This Dutch chessplayer has inspired one woman to become a chess professional:

Tonya Harding.

gaereagdag
Dischyzer wrote:

Plus, where do I check out these punishing jokes of linuxblu1 and AndyClifton. I could use them perhaps when I need to inlict pain on my older brother for beating me at chess. I do feel better having cleared that up DarthMasterguns.

Now speaking of handicaps . . . Knight odds from my brother . . . we all agree it is a slap in the face.

THe jokes are there in every sentence that we post Laughing

ElKitch

What I dont understand is this:

- the perpetrator was on a break
- he came back late
- his opponent had started the clock, while he was away (normal rule appaerantly?)
- he comes back and the TD decides to restart the game (and thus the clocks)
- perpetrator loses and hits the other guy with a glas

The perpetrator should be happy that he got a restart! 

The fact that I mentioned him having some kind of mental condition was not to say that he doesnt deserve any kind of punishment. Appearantly he cant deal with a loss and if the results in hitting with a glass.. well then he should not be in that situation again.

But I do think that we should bear with him a bit. I cant be sure, but I think his condition has a big role in this incident. So perhaps he should not be permanently excluded, but temporarily. And in the future he may only play with someone who can help him cope with loss. After all it is a good thing that people with such conditions are part of normal everyday life.

eddysallin

       #1... Paper cups at all future events . #2....Instutitional passes canceled when chess tourns. start #3.....mild mental problem and chess, now theres a great partnership 

FunWithChess20
ElKitch wrote:

What I dont understand is this:

- the perpetrator was on a break
- he came back late
- his opponent had started the clock, while he was away (normal rule appaerantly?)
- he comes back and the TD decides to restart the game (and thus the clocks)
- perpetrator loses and hits the other guy with a glas

The perpetrator should be happy that he got a restart! 

I agree, apparently he was still upset with his clock being started early.

his opponent had started the clock, while he was away (normal rule appaerantly?)

Yes, it is a normal rule. When the round starts it starts. Although when an arbiter is present, it is common that (s)he starts the clock.

The fact that I mentioned him some kind of mental condition was not to say that he doesnt deserve any kind of punishment.

I understand.

But I do think that we should bear with him a bit.

I agree we should help him to prevent acting this way again. After he has received his normal punishment.

I cant be sure, but I think his condition has a big role in this incident. 

Well,..I think it is used and accepted to much as an excuse. In your post you allready accept that his 'mild condition' played a huge part and state that the punishment should probably be lessened. But (I asume) you don't even know what this mild condition is. For all I know, it is just the interpretation of something a policeofficer said against a journalist. 

So perhaps he should not be permanently excluded, but temporarily. 

I really disagree on this. Just think about the effect it would have on the paricipants of the future tournament who have witnessed his act.

 And in the future he may only play with someone who can help him cope with loss. 

That sounds like a good idea. But with that you do exclude him from every future swiss tournament and teammatch. In fact you exclude him from every tournament I think. So he could only play "stand alone" games with selected individuals. Having said that, I think it is a good idea.

After all it is a good thing that people with such conditions are part of normal everyday life.

Once again, I don't know the "mild condition" But offcourse if possible he should be part of everyday life. And like you said we should be extra carefull if people have conditions that make them dangerous. But in my opinion absolutely not by lowering pennalties for unacceptable behaviour. Cushioning in other ways like selecting opponents, giving anger management classes etc, are fine offcourse.  

Oh and thx for responding. It's appreciated.Smile

Sunofthemorninglight

can't beat effective arbitration

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-uZGPPpJS4a4/UGzh8C1bXcI/AAAAAAAAAfs/62F6UwT7CwI/s1600/tumblr_mb3oovozFD1qc8ngyo1_500.gif

x-5058622868
ElKitch wrote:

I read another article that made me feel sorry for the man who hitted. Ofcourse no one should hit.. but the pepetrator appearantly had mental issues.

BERKEL-ENSCHOT - A 35-year-old chess player from Eindhoven Saturday ended up in hospital after he was assaulted by his opponent. The perpetrator, a 27-year old man from Tilburg, was accused of unsportsmanlike conduct, where the victim wanted to complain to the stewards, police said. The victim was several times with a glass on his head beaten. He was hospitalized for observation.

The men got into a fight during their party in a chess tournament in Berkel-Enschot. The perpetrator accused the victim of unsportsmanlike conduct during the game. The arbiter judged that the party just to continue. Just after the party so the man from Son en Breugel was won, flipped his opponent. The Tilburger jumped into his neck and hit him several times with a glass.

 

Men disassembled

Other participants took the men apart. The victim has been unconscious for some time. The perpetrator fled. The chess tournament in hotel Druiventros is a half hour interruption occurred. Police and an ambulance were warned.

 

The organization of the tournament was shocked by the incident. She announced that the offender is no longer welcome at the next edition of the tournament.

It doesn't justify the attack, but it adds to the explanation. The perpetrator was already agitated by what he thought was unsportsmanlike conduct, coupled with the loss, and then the guy flips him off -the cherry on top.

FunWithChess20
Sunshiny wrote:
ElKitch wrote:

 

It doesn't justify the attack, but it adds to the explanation. The perpetrator was already agitated by what he thought was unsportsmanlike conduct, coupled with the loss, and then the guy flips him off -the cherry on top.

He was not flipped off. Elkitch (or the software used by Elkitch) did not translate correct.

The original sentence in Dutch is: "Net na de partij die dus door de man uit Eindhoven werd gewonnen, flipte zijn tegenstander."

This was wrongly translated as "Just after the party so the man from Son en Breugel was won, flipped his opponent."

A better translation is: Just after the match ended, which was won by the male from Eindhoven his opponent went beserk.

"Flippen" is Dutch for going crazy/nana/beserk/etcTongue Out

Source:

http://www.omroepbrabant.nl/?news/188023692/Slachtoffer+schaakgeweld+Berkel-Enschot+Niet+verwacht+aan+schaken+hersenschudding+over+te+houden.aspx (Dutch)

CanonicalKnight

Ah.  You don't often see the Verre d'Eau Attack combined with the Tête Defense...fortunately.  Wink

Dutchday

Indeed a laughable translation. The incident is also sad. It is one thing to assault a cheating opponent, but to use a glass? And then it turns out there was no cheating at all.

Yes, normally you should tell the arbiter the opponent is late, unless you were told downright to start the clock at the beginning of the round. 

Fingerly
eddysallin wrote:

       #1... Paper cups at all future events . #2....Instutitional passes canceled when chess tourns. start #3.....mild mental problem and chess, now theres a great partnership 

4. Mandatory helmets.

5. On-site psychiatric help for losers and/or people with thin skin who cannot take criticism.

It's crazy to think how many aspects of everyday life get nerfed over time because of one nut case.

Dutchday

You can joke around, but plastic beer cups at events are actually fairly common around here. 

FunWithChess20
Fingerly wrote:
eddysallin wrote:

       #1... Paper cups at all future events . #2....Instutitional passes canceled when chess tourns. start #3.....mild mental problem and chess, now theres a great partnership 

4. Mandatory helmets.

5. On-site psychiatric help for losers and/or people with thin skin who cannot take criticism.

It's crazy to think how many aspects of everyday life get nerfed over time because of one nut case.

Hmm there are commercial opportunities as well... Lets sell "chess"-insuarances.

FunWithChess20
Dutchday wrote:

You can joke around, but plastic beer cups at events are actually fairly common around here. 

True,..

but with joking I think he is trying to state that, that fact is sad..

x-5058622868
FunWithChess20 wrote:
Sunshiny wrote:
ElKitch wrote:

 

It doesn't justify the attack, but it adds to the explanation. The perpetrator was already agitated by what he thought was unsportsmanlike conduct, coupled with the loss, and then the guy flips him off -the cherry on top.

He was not flipped off. Elkitch (or the software used by Elkitch) did not translate correct.

The original sentence in Dutch is: "Net na de partij die dus door de man uit Eindhoven werd gewonnen, flipte zijn tegenstander."

This was wrongly translated as "Just after the party so the man from Son en Breugel was won, flipped his opponent."

A better translation is: Just after the match ended, which was won by the male from Eindhoven his opponent went beserk.

"Flippen" is Dutch for going crazy/nana/beserk/etc

Source:

http://www.omroepbrabant.nl/?news/188023692/Slachtoffer+schaakgeweld+Berkel-Enschot+Niet+verwacht+aan+schaken+hersenschudding+over+te+houden.aspx (Dutch)

Thanks for the correction. Flipped is also used in English for going crazy. It was the wording that threw me. It would possible have read better if it said "...his opponent flipped."

Dutchday

The word order can become inverted in Dutch. Apparently the translator isn't sophisticated enough to recognize that.

bobbyDK
Dutchday stem

Indeed a laughable translation. The incident is also sad. It is one thing to assault a cheating opponent, but to use a glass? And then it turns out there was no cheating at all.

Yes, normally you should tell the arbiter the opponent is late, unless you were told downright to start the clock at the beginning of the round. 

in all tournaments I have been we start the clocks simultaniously even though we know the opponent is late. chess clubs need to close and therefore we cannot start the clock at +1 after all games, and have 4 hours of game.