x
Chess - Play & Learn

Chess.com

FREE - In Google Play

FREE - in Win Phone Store

VIEW

ethics of an opponent's technology blunder

  • #41
    skleerbracht wrote:

     

     This wasn't a bad but intentional move, it was dropping the piece on the wrong square by accident.

     

    If not for such accidents, I would never lose at bullet.

  • #42

    As the player who made the blunder, I did not want the win. the loss was most deserved.

    Commenters should understand the conditional blunder was more than a slip of the wrist. I foolishly tried to build all the possible variations within a mate in 8 as conditionals. For what I thought were less likely moves I did not pay adequate attention in editing. The main lines were edited with care. It appears that my opponent decided to end the game faster than necessary and therefore followed one of the least likely conditionals--to ultimate victory!  

    Lesson, don't show off by building complex conditionals.

    Pride precedeth the fall!

  • #43
    deess wrote:

    As the player who made the blunder, I did not want the win. the loss was most deserved.

    Commenters should understand the conditional blunder was more than a slip of the wrist. I foolishly tried to build all the possible variations within a mate in 8 as conditionals. For what I thought were less likely moves I did not pay adequate attention in editing. The main lines were edited with care. It appears that my opponent decided to end the game faster than necessary and therefore followed one of the least likely conditionals--to ultimate victory!  

    Lesson, don't show off by building complex conditionals.

    Pride precedeth the fall!

    lol you dug up this thread after 6 months?

Top

Online Now