17566 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Classes over, got to play some blitz for the first time in a while, a lot of fun. I see there are still talent threads lol :p
Although you're all probably sick of them, for those that do go ahead an post, what factors do you think go into building skill? Don't really want to talk about what doesn't factor in until there's a clear argument about what does count.
More than time x effort? After my break form chess my (long) games feel easier to play somehow, like I can see things better. Got me thinking about that + davidegpc blocked me so can't post there.
Factors into building skill:
-is the way a brain think like the speed
-understand where's your weak point is
-be careful in the field(chess-board f\game set-up)..
I hope this helps. >_>
Lol he blocked me too
Skill at the highest level = (Hard work + Motivation + Innate talent), in my opinion. Even the bum Capablanca had to have some motivation to become the WCC. The hard work component is obvious. Some people will criticize the "innate talent" component, but I'll stick with the assumption that a "divine spark" is needed. At the TOP LEVEL, once again.
I had no problem with people ignoring this topic . Looking back at davidegpc's posts seems it's already been beaten to death. Was glad though that some rational people did manage to make some good posts in there (even if david characteristically ignored them).
But yeah, if you think about it, isolating the factors time and effort we see that they alone contain no attributes directly linked to skill building. Building skill is a biological function first, and building a working definition using these functions will inevitably manifest what some call talent. As was already pointed out it's mostly a problem of semantics -- or in david's case, genuinely and sincerely, I believe reading comprehension.
Going over your games, like Botvinnik did. Or was is that Kotov ?
by DMGame 3 minutes ago
by kaynight 4 minutes ago
Nakamura is Japanese not American
by lofina_eidel_ismail 6 minutes ago
Sub 1000 (ranging from just below 1000 to about 400 :O)
by With_every_step 6 minutes ago
Why do you need to say draw in the middle of a game
by kaynight 7 minutes ago
10/25/2016 - Too Far Advanced
by AbhiTheGr8 7 minutes ago
The notion that <1000 is awful?
by AIM-AceMove 7 minutes ago
Why are so many non members on this site?
by aidan0816 21 minutes ago
To the people who won't stop complaining about other people
by kaynight 25 minutes ago
Time loss for f2p players punishes many other players
by ponz111 38 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!