21558 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I mean, the analogies are drawn between chess and language because both are extremely complicated (though might seem relatively simple if you're extremely familiar with them and had tons of practice, as is the case with language). And thus, there is just going to be a mass quantity of things to learn about chess. It would be like learning a strategy game with 157 different types of units or buildings, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. No matter how smart you are, you still will have to take in a ton of time just to know what these all are, let alone know what makes them good/bad, and how they work together.
Even if the child doesn't have as deep of an understanding as an adult would when learning these things for the first time, he might be able to develop patterns more quickly, and that could be more useful. Later when he matures he can get a better understanding of these patterns.
And the idea that a lot of chess learning is about quantity is quite corroborated by the fact that GMs constantly tell people simplistic sounding advice like "just do a ridiculous amount of puzzles" etc, just shove them down your throat almost. Of course we know that it's not so simple, but developing patterns (almost) like a zombie is one important aspect for getting good at chess, and that probably doesn't require as much problem solving skills as you would think.
It's just weird that you have these really "dumb" kids, whose problem solving is probably hundreds of times worse than a lot of adults, yet they're becoming IMs etc. Yes, only a very low percentage of them get there, but the fact that an even lower percentage of adults get there, who you'd think would be thousands of times more capable of understanding chess, seems even more surprising. Of course to be fair, the kids pretty much need fantastic coaches to do anything like this.
I don't know, just some thoughts. This might have been a tangent -- I guess now I'm talking more about how much of chess is helped by learning early, etc, which doesn't necessarily tie into whether chess requires a lot of talent or not. But it's still interesting to discuss.
Define natural talent. If you have experience playing ga.es of strategy and tactics then qhen you firat start the the the playing chess you have an advatage
Haed qork goes a llong way talentwd or not
Haha, haven't seen you in so long, royalbishop! Remember me? :)
Haha, really, or are you just messing with me? I guess it was a while ago. You probably wouldn't want to remember me though, anyway :)
I have changed since then. More docuaed on game. I jpined a chess club and they real opened my eyes ti the game. So much that i thought i qas good at others were wau stronger.my bigesr leason was game preparation. I ran into some tricky players that practice that all the time. In a tourny clock is ticking.
In touny I did not know about all the different clock rules. Laugh if you want but idid not know you better brung your own clock for awveral rwasons
Sorry not to Ger off topi . I just noticed. Been gone a while sorry for multi post.
But the clock plays a serious role in tourny. Talente or not..
If you get to tourny later than opponent rhey can pull ouy their clock.
Say the clock iis damaged and in rhe last 10 sec it jums to 1 sec- game over and you had more time than opponent. And that happens randomlu. So you have ro prove it. Plus show how much much time waa left on borh sides in a game you know you had won
Oh yeah, there's nothing like playing chess over the board with a clock.
Yes, time is almost as important as the game itself. You want to use every single minute wisely. I've screwed up so many great positions because I didn't have enough time to play them properly, and I still do.
by mengmeng98 a few minutes ago
Chess legends. Where would be Carlson's position in a list?
by alexm2310 3 minutes ago
by mengmeng98 4 minutes ago
More of the conspiracy
by ChessOfPlayer 4 minutes ago
Possible to Become FM, IM, or GM without Coaching or Reading Books?
by TRextastic 5 minutes ago
LauriAikio the cheat detecter
by LauriAikio 7 minutes ago
Which opening system to chose?
by The_catscan 7 minutes ago
by mengmeng98 8 minutes ago
Jealous of other Success
by TRextastic 9 minutes ago
Ideas for Making Chess More Popular as a Sport?
by AaronGo 9 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!