12509 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I don't think that someone can appreciate something he's totally unable to understand... in our case, this is good chess.
even though it sounds somewhat logical, i still dont like picasso.
All those of you cheapoes who say that $100 that is enough not just for a game with Carlsen but also a dinner and analysis, have a look at this link:
2600$ I wouldn't spend on chess, if I had to spent that kind of money I would go on vacation 2 weeks somewhere warm maybe Italy.
spain would be also cool
Nothing. But I might play him if I were paid $1,000 apearance fee.
Any less and it would be a waste of time for both of us.
People would really pay to play him? :D
i rather would hire a tea master who makes me the perfect tea for that money
Not worth a dime. It would be like me paying Nolan Ryan at his peak to bat against him (American Baseball). My only chance of getting on base would be to lean into a pitch and get hit by the ball - and where's the fun in that?
The fun is in touching the greatness. A memory for a lifetime.
The highest i can afford and he would accept as long as its a casual game and he would give me the moves with explanations so that i can beat him.
Carlsen would have owned Fischer's ass from here to Reykjavik...
Not in the 1960's. He would be helpless in age where opening theory was just starting out and where one had no computer analysis to rely on.
Let's be honest, Carlsen is a by-product of the computer age. If Fischer had the same exact benefits, he would be a God.
I love how the 50% of people who worship Kasparov claim that Carlson has poor opening prep and doesn't analyze openings enough.
The 50% who worship Fischer claim that without his opening prep he would be killed.
Well i would say Fischer would win either way.
I'd rather play Petrosian or Tal. I'd pay 1000$ for that.
i would rather play Morphy or Fischer
It's all relative.
To some $2600 is a lot of money, to others it isn't.
In comparison to ringside seats or a private box at a top football game, it's not that outrageous.
I think the last David Haye fight was 1500 Euros for ringside and there was no one to one, dinner or analysis of his fight with him afterwards.
I bet some can even deduct the money saying it goes to charity if they have a smart auditor.
Nothing. I would pay 50€ to play Kasparov, 20€ Kramnik, others nothing. :)
but when you go to a boxing match you at least see hot women, when i have to look at Carlsen for 2 hours i at least want to get paid for having to do that.
exactly like me! but I'm stingy so 10€ to Kasparov and 4€ to Kramnik :D
Bullet chess:The secret to mastery.
by DaveyJones01 5 minutes ago
by silvia_trench 9 minutes ago
2/7/2016 - Quick And Painless
by SMSAmanda 10 minutes ago
Illegal games :)
by silvia_trench 12 minutes ago
How to stop fried liver attack?
by xman720 16 minutes ago
2/6/2016 - Pawn Attack
by silvia_trench 16 minutes ago
by Christopher_Parsons 20 minutes ago
Most Feared Defences
by AJMOHIO 21 minutes ago
by verylate 23 minutes ago
Open Challenge - Fischer Match Conditions
by FischerPsychology 30 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!