I did a 99.7 accuracy moves game! - Chess Forums - Page 4

unitedmonkeys

Mar 7, 2024

0

#61

theswooze wrote:

unitedmonkeys wrote:

Sack_o_Potatoes wrote:

i have 100% and its a short game doesnt count

it's impossible to have 100%

I'll try a test wait

It is definitely NOT impossible to have a game of 100% accuracy. Any short game consisting of all book moves by the winner will accomplish this. You are making WAY too big of a deal about something that can happen to even relatively weak chess players.

i know that. bro i legit wrote that 2 years ago. now i know how possible it is

theswooze

Mar 7, 2024

0

#62

unitedmonkeys wrote:

theswooze wrote:

unitedmonkeys wrote:

Sack_o_Potatoes wrote:

i have 100% and its a short game doesnt count

it's impossible to have 100%

I'll try a test wait

It is definitely NOT impossible to have a game of 100% accuracy. Any short game consisting of all book moves by the winner will accomplish this. You are making WAY too big of a deal about something that can happen to even relatively weak chess players.

i know that. bro i legit wrote that 2 years ago. now i know how possible it is

so wtf are you bragging about??

unitedmonkeys

Mar 10, 2024

0

#63

theswooze wrote:

unitedmonkeys wrote:

theswooze wrote:

unitedmonkeys wrote:

Hello,

As you can see, I am not a really strong player, but I did 99.7 accuracy moves vs 1200! The record so far was 99.6 accuracy which was played by Magnus Carlsen. Am I the next grandmaster???

This has been edited. First, I wrote 99.5 but turns out it was even 99.7!

first, no one cares that you got a 99.7% accuracy rating except for you. second, no. it does not mean you are the next grandmaster.

ok bro. stop acting as if you had a better game.

what in tarnation are you talking about, 'bro'? my game has nothing to do with the OP's post.

i am the OP poster of this game, genius

unitedmonkeys

Mar 10, 2024

0

#64

theswooze wrote:

unitedmonkeys wrote:

theswooze wrote:

unitedmonkeys wrote:

Sack_o_Potatoes wrote:

i have 100% and its a short game doesnt count

it's impossible to have 100%

I'll try a test wait

It is definitely NOT impossible to have a game of 100% accuracy. Any short game consisting of all book moves by the winner will accomplish this. You are making WAY too big of a deal about something that can happen to even relatively weak chess players.

i know that. bro i legit wrote that 2 years ago. now i know how possible it is

so wtf are you bragging about??

well dont u think that 10 year olds are kinda more autistic than 13 year olds?

theswooze

Mar 11, 2024

0

#65

unitedmonkeys wrote:

theswooze wrote:

unitedmonkeys wrote:

theswooze wrote:

unitedmonkeys wrote:

Hello,

As you can see, I am not a really strong player, but I did 99.7 accuracy moves vs 1200! The record so far was 99.6 accuracy which was played by Magnus Carlsen. Am I the next grandmaster???

This has been edited. First, I wrote 99.5 but turns out it was even 99.7!

first, no one cares that you got a 99.7% accuracy rating except for you. second, no. it does not mean you are the next grandmaster.

ok bro. stop acting as if you had a better game.

what in tarnation are you talking about, 'bro'? my game has nothing to do with the OP's post.

i am the OP poster of this game, genius

no one said you werent...genius.

theswooze

Mar 11, 2024

0

#66

unitedmonkeys wrote:

theswooze wrote:

unitedmonkeys wrote:

theswooze wrote:

unitedmonkeys wrote:

Sack_o_Potatoes wrote:

i have 100% and its a short game doesnt count

it's impossible to have 100%

I'll try a test wait

It is definitely NOT impossible to have a game of 100% accuracy. Any short game consisting of all book moves by the winner will accomplish this. You are making WAY too big of a deal about something that can happen to even relatively weak chess players.

i know that. bro i legit wrote that 2 years ago. now i know how possible it is

so wtf are you bragging about??

well dont u think that 10 year olds are kinda more autistic than 13 year olds?

nope. but being ten years old explains a lot.

ChickenSaysHello

Mar 11, 2024

0

#67

I did a 100% accuracy on a game

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/103846896667?tab=review

theswooze

Mar 11, 2024

0

#68

ChickenSaysHello wrote:

I did a 100% accuracy on a game

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/103846896667?tab=review

Well done! Like most 100% accuracy games, it was short (only nine moves) and opponent put up a relatively weak effort (57% accuracy). Not criticizing you, just a general observation.

IncrediblyBadAtChess100

9 days ago

0

#69

Now it's saying 96.7

CHATMONITOR

8 days ago

0

#70

Nice job. You did 1,000% better than I ever could.

CHATMONITOR

8 days ago

0

#71

ChickenSaysHello wrote:

I did a 100% accuracy on a game

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/103846896667?tab=review

checked it out and it looks SUPER staged.

CHATMONITOR

8 days ago

0

#72

just saying

CHATMONITOR

8 days ago

0

#73

gpriverb wrote:

Nice job. You did 1,000% better than I ever could.

Oh yeah I said this before I checked it out so yah

unitedmonkeys

8 days ago

0

#74

?

ChessIsFun314159

8 days ago

0

#75

unitedmonkeys wrote:

Hello,

As you can see, I am not a really strong player, but I did 99.7 accuracy moves vs 1200! The record so far was 99.6 accuracy which was played by Magnus Carlsen. Am I the next grandmaster???

This has been edited. First, I wrote 99.5 but turns out it was even 99.7!

Great job on the game! One thing to consider though is that grandmasters have stronger opponents, so its harder to make the best moves. That's still insane though.